Integrating reading and writing in academic writing class

Authors

  • Fernandita Gusweni Jayanti

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25170/ijelt.v9i2.1513

Keywords:

integrated reading and writing, writing instructions, writing ability, cognitive styles

Abstract

Based on the theories and empirical data of the advantages of orchestrating integrated skills in the classroom and the connections between reading and writing skill, this study aims to find out the effects of integrated reading-writing instruction on students’ writing ability. The moderating effect of cognitive styles was also investigated. The present study adopted a quasi-experimental design with 2 x 2 factorial analyses. The subjects of this study were 87 students at STKIP PGRI Jombang. An experimental group using integrated reading-writing instruction was randomly assigned for comparison with a group using a traditional teaching model. At first, the participants were asked to perform Group Embedded Figure Test (GEFT) to determine their cognitive styles. After that, the participants were asked to write an expository essay as the pre-test to justify that both groups had the same writing ability before the treatment. After seven meetings of treatment, they were asked to write another expository essay as the post-test. Based on ANOVA analyses, it was found that the students taught by using integrated reading-writing instruction did not achieve significantly better writing score than students taught by writing instruction only: neither for the field-independent students nor the field-dependent ones.

References

Brown, H.D. (2007). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. New York: Pearson Education.
Byrnes , J.P. (2009). Cognitive development and learning in instructional contexts. Boston: Pearson Education.
Cakan, M. (2001). Interaction between cognitive styles and assessment approaches. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University: Virginia.
Delaney, A. Y. (2008). Investigating the reading-to-write construct. Journal of English for academic purposes, 7, 140-150.
Ebrahimi, A., Zeynali, S., &Dodman, K. (2013).The effect of field dependence\independence cognitive style on deductive/inductive grammar teaching. International journal of academic research in progressive education and development, 4(2), 44-52.
Fitzgerald, J. & Shanahan, T. 2000. Reading and writing relations and their development. Educational Psychologist, 35(1), 39-50.
Koons, H. H. 2008. The reading-writing connection: An investigation of the relationship between reading ability and writing quality across multiple grades and three writing discourse modes. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.
Palmer, M.L. 2010.The relationship between reading fluency, writing fluency, and reading comprehension in suburban third-grade students. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. San Diego: San Diego State University and the University of San Diego.
Peha, S (2003). What is good writing? Retrieved on 10 April 2014 from the website teaching that Makes Sens at http://www.ttms.org/
Perin, D. 1998.Assessing the reading-writing relationship in adult literacy students. Reading Psychology:An international quarterly, 19: 141-183.
Sadeghi, K., Khonbi, Z., A. &Langroudy, E., P. (2013).The relationship between cognitive style and use of reading strategies by Iranian EFL learners.Global Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 3(1), 8-18.
Salmani, M.A. 2006. Cognitive style as a factor affecting task-based reading comprehension test scores.TESL CanadaJournal, 24:1.
Saracho, O.N. (1989). Cognitive style: individual differences. Early Child Development and Care, 53, 75-81.
Shan, L. &Niannian, Z. 2006. The influence of cognitive style and reading strategies on English reading: An empirical study. Teaching English in China, 29(3), 56-63.
Tiedt, I.M., Gibbs, R., Timpson, M.,Howard & M., Williams, M.Y. 1989. Reading/Thinking/Writing: A holistic language and literacy program for the K-8 Classroom. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Tierney, R., & Shanahan, T. 1991. Research on the reading–writing relationship: Interactions, transactions, and outcomes. In R. Barr, M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal& D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research Vol. II. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Witkin, H.A., Oltman, P.K., Raskin, E., Karp, S.A. 1971. A manual for embedded figure test.Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists.

Downloads

Published

2013-10-31
Abstract views: 26 | PDF downloads: 24