FRAUD PENTAGON DAN ANCAMAN KEBANGKRUTAN STUDI PADA PERUSAHAAN PERBANKAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25170/balance.v19i2.3882Keywords:
Fraud Pentagon, Financial Distress, Zmijewski (X-Score), threat of bankruptcyAbstract
The purpose of the study was to determine the effect of the fraud pentagon on the threat of bankruptcy in banking companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2018-2020. The fraud Pentagon consists of five indicators namely external pressure, effective monitoring, auditor turnover, director turnover and the number of frequent CEO photos. While the threat of bankruptcy is measured by the X-Score. The method of data analysis is descriptive and hypothesis testing using multiple linear regression analysis. The research sample is 122 financial statements from 42 banking companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2018-2020. The results showed that external pressure variables and changes in auditors had an effect on the threat of bankruptcy. While the variables of effective supervision, the change of directors and the number of CEO photos that often have no effect on the threat of bankruptcy
References
Albrecht, W.S., Albrect, C. O., Albrecht, C. C., & Zimbelman, M. F. (2012). Fraud Examination, Forth Edition (4 ed). South-Western Cengange Learning.
Al-Manaseer, S. R. & Al-Oshaibat,S. D. (2018). Validity Of Altman Z-Score Model to Predict Financial Failure: Evidence From Jordan. Canadian Center of Science and Education. International Journal of Economics and Finance; Vol. 10, No. 8
Amaliah, I. (2016). Analisis Rasio Keuangan Dengan Zmijewski (X-Score) Dalam Memprediksi Kebangkrutan Pada Perbankan Syariah di Indonesia Periode 2012-2015. Respository UIN Jakarta
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2002). Consideration of fraud in a financial statement audit. Statement on Auditing Standards No. 99. New York, NY: AICPA.
Aprilia, V. R. (2019). Pengaruh financial stability, external pressure, ineffectivemonitoring, change in auditor, change in director Dan frequent number Of CEO’s picture terhadap financial statement fraud dalam perspektif fraud pentagon (Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar Di Bei Tahun 2011-2016), Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Ilmu Ekonomi Universitas Riau.
Aprilia. (2017). The Analysis Of The Effect Of Fraud Pentagon on Financial Statement Fraud Using Beneish Model In Companies Aplaying The Corporate Governance Scorecard. Jurnal Akuntansi Riset.
Apriliana, S. & Agustina, L. (2017). The Analysis of Fraudulent Financial Reporting Determinant throught Fraud Pentagon Approach. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi, 9 (2), 154-165.
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE) (2019). Indonesia Chapter 111. Survai Fraud Indonesia 2019. Retrieved https://acfe-indonesia.or.id/survei-fraud-indonesia/-
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE) (2020). Report to the Nation on Occupational Fraud Abuse. Retrieved https://acfepublic.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/2020-Report-to-the-Nations.pdf
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE) (2021). The Fraud Triangle Retrievedhttps://www.acfe.com/fraud-triangle.aspx
Association of Internal Certified Professional Accountant (AICPA). (2002). Statement on Auditing Standards No. 99: Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit. New York: American Institute of Certified Public Accountant.
Aulia, V. & Afiah, E. T. (2020). Financial Stability, Financial Targets, Effective Monitoring dan Rationalization dan kecurangan laporan keuangan. Jurnal Revenue Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo
Brigham, E. F., & Daves, P. R. (2014). Intermediate Financial Management. Cengage Learning.
Budyanto, V. A. (2021). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Fraud Diamond Dalam Mendeteksi Fraudulent Financial Statement Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2017-2019. https://lib.atmajaya.ac.id/
Carla (2020). Penggunaan fraud pentagon dalam mendeteksi fraudulent financial reporting (studi empiris pada perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di BEI tahun 2016-2018). https://lib.atmajaya.ac.id/
Chairunesia, W., Sutra, P. R., & Wahyudi, S.M. (2018). Pengaruh good Corporate governance dan financial distress terdahap manajemen laba pada perusahaan indesia yang masuk dalam asean corporate governance scored, Profita: Komunikasi Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Perpajakan, 11(2).
Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other People’s Money: A Study of the Social Psychology of Embezziement. Glencooe, IL : Free Press
Dahni, F. (2019). Altman Z-Score Vs Zmijewski X-Score dalam memprediksi kebangkrutan perusahaan (Studi Kasus PT Tiga Pilar Sejahtera (AISA) tahun 2015-2017). Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis.
Fadrul, F. & Ridarwati. R (2020) Analysis of Method Used to Predict Financial Distress Potential in Pulp and Paper Companies of Indonesia. International Journal of Economics Development Research.
Finance Detik. (2019, 26 Juli ). Kronologi Laporan Keuangan Garuda, Dari Untung Jadi 'Buntung'. https://finance.detik.com/bursa-dan-valas/d-4640204/kronologi-laporan-keuangan-garuda-dari-untung-jadi-buntung
Gamayuni, R. R. (2011). Analisis ketepatan model altman sebagai alatuntuk memprediksi kebangkrutan. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, vol. 16 No.2
Ghozali. (2018). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan IBM SPSS 25. Forum Ilmiah Pendidikan Akuntansi Universitas PGRI Madiun.
Godfrey, J., Hodgson, A., Tarca, A., Hamilton, J., & Holmes, S. (2010). Accounting Theory (7th ed). Milton, Qld: John Wiley & Sons, Australia Ltd.
Howarth, C. (2011). Why The Fraud Triangle Is No Longer Enough. In Horwath, Crowe LLP.
Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia (2015) . PSAK No. 1 Tentang Laporan Keuangan
Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia (2015) Pernyataan Standar Akuntansi Keuangan. Jakarta : Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia.
Jensen, M. C. & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerialbehavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of financial Economics, Vol 3.
Listyarini, F. (2020) Analisis Perbandingan Prediksi Kondisi Financial Distress dengan metode model Altman, Springate,dan Zmijewski. Jurnal Bina Akuntansi. Vol.7 No.1 Hal 1 – 20
Maghfiroh, N., Komala, A. & Syafnita (2015). Analisis pengaruh financial stability, personal need, external pressure, dan ineffective monitoring dalam perspektif fraud, Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis universitas Pekalongan.
Messier, W. F., Glover, S.M., dan Prawitt, D.F. (2006). Auditing and Assurance Services a Systematic Approach. Edisi Keempat. Penerbit Salemba 4. McGraw-Hill Irwin.Singapore.
Nadia, A. (2019). Penggunaan fraud diamond theory dalam mendeteksi fraudulent financial reporting (studi empiris pada perusahaan manufaktur di bei pada tahun 2015-2017). https://lib.atmajaya.ac.id/
News Detik. (2011, 29 November) Malinda Bobol 37 Nasabah Citigold Citibank dalam 4 Tahun. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-1763389/malinda-bobol-37-nasabah-citigold-citibank-dalam-4-tahun
Nurbaiti, A. & Suatkab, N. (2019). Analisis Fraud Diamond dalam Mendeteksi Fraudulent Financial Statement. Jurnal Manajemen Indonesia pekalongan.
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2017). Pasal 19 ayat .1 Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 57/PJOK.04/2017. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. ojk.go.id
Pinta, C. N. (2018). Pengaruh pressure, opportunity dan rationalization terhadap fraudulent financial reporting pada perusahaan pertambangan yan terdaftar di bursa efek indonesia tahun 2008-2016. Repositori Insititusi universitas Sumatera Utara
Platt, H. D., & M. B. Platt. (2002). Predicting Corporate financial Distress: Reflections on Choice-Based sample Bias. Journal of Economics and finance.Vol. 26, No. 2.
Pravidy, A. A. (2019). Analisis pengaruh fraud pentagon terhad fraudulent financial reporting dengan menggunakan metode altmanstudi empiris pada perusahaan sektor perbankan yang terdaftar di BEI tahun 2014-2018. https://lib.atmajaya.ac.id/
Ramadhani, A. S., & Lukviarman, N. (2009). Perbandingan Analisis Prediksi Kebangkrutan Menggunakan Model Altman Pertama, Altman Revisi, dan Altman Modifikasi Dengan Ukuran dan Umur Perusahaan Sebagai Variabel Penjelas (Studi Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia). Jurnal Siasat Bisnis Vol. 13 No. 1, p. 15-28.
Sihombing, K. S., & Rahardjo, S. N. (2014). Analisis fraud diamond dalam mendeteksi financial statement fraud: studi empiris pada perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di bursa efek indonesia (bei) tahun 2010-2012. Diponegoro Journal Accounting, 3(2), 1-12.
Skousen, C., Smith, K., & Wright, C. (2008). Detecting and predicting financial statement fraud: The effectiveness of the fraud triangle and SAS No. 99. Corporate Governance and Firm Performance.
Tuanakotta, T. M. (2010). Akuntansi Forensik dan Auditor Investigatif. Lembaga Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia (LPFE UI). Edisi ke 2: Jakarta.
Tuanakotta, T. M. (2012). Audit Berbasis ISA (International Standards on Auditing). Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Widyatama, W. (2020). Analisis pengaruh fraud pentagon theory terhadap fraudulent financial Reporting Pada Perusahaan Perbankan Yang Terdaftar di BURSA Efek Indonesia Periode 2014 – 2019. https://lib.atmajaya.ac.id/
Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The Fraud Diamond: Considering the Four Elements of Fraud. CPA Journal, Vol. 74, Issue 12.
Yohanes, K. (2020). Analisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi financial statement fraud pada perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di bursa efek indonesia tahun 2014-2018. https://lib.atmajaya.ac.id/
Zmijewski, M. (1984). Methodological Issues Related to the Estimation of Financial Distress Prediction Models. Journal of Accounting Research, 22, 59- 82
