ANALISIS MATERIALITAS PADA PROSEDUR AUDIT VOUCHING ATAS AKUN BEBAN OPERASIONAL

Authors

  • Rani Chrisna Putri UPN "Veteran" Jawa Timur
  • Erna Sulistyowati UPN "Veteran" Jawa Timur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25170/balance.v20i2.4468

Keywords:

Materiality, Procedure, Audit, Vouching, Expense

Abstract

In the era of society 5.0, the auditor profession will continue to exist even though the threat of AI (Artificial Intelligence) has come, bearing in mind that there are many human intelligences that cannot be replaced by any robots. An auditor needs to have an understanding of materiality, where this concept relates to how large a misstatement contained in an assertion can be accepted by the auditor so that users of financial statements are not affected by the magnitude of the misstatement. One of the applications of materiality is the vouching audit procedure. Vouching is a test carried out by the auditor to check the authenticity or correctness of the occurrence of a transaction presented in the financial statements through physical source documents. Vouching for operating expense accounts is important to do because there are many findings indicating irregularities in the presentation of operating expenses in the financial statements. The method used is a qualitative research-descriptive analysis based on the results of interviews with 4 people at Public Accounting Firms and Public ABC as samples and observations. This study aims to get answers regarding the importance of materiality in vouching audit procedures for operating expense accounts.

References

Ardianingsih, A., & Ilmiani, A. (2020). Analisis Profesionalisme dan Etika Profesi dalam Penentuan Pertimbangan Tingkat Materialitas. Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis, dan Akuntansi, 21(4).

Azzahra, B. (2021). Akuntan 4.0: Roda Penggerak Nilai Keberlanjutan Perusahaan melalui Artificial Intelligence & Tech Analytics pada Era Disruptif. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 16(2), 87-98.

Cahyadi, W., & Zuhroh, D. (2022). Pengendalian audit internal Fraud atas persediaan barang dalam proses pada CV “X” DI SURABAYA. Akuntansi'45: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 3(2), 64-69.

Evadine, R. (2021). Pengaruh pendapatan, beban operasional dan likuiditas terhadap laba bersih pada perusahaan retail yang go public di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) periode 2013-2017. Jurnal Ilmiah Simantek, 5(1), 10-20.

Fachruddin, W., & Pribadi, A. (2018). Apakah Prosedur Audit merupakan Pengungkit Besarnya Penetapan Fee Audit? Methosika: Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Methodist, 1(2), 181-192.

Laila, C. H., & Novita, N. (2019). Pengaruh Kode Etik, Materialitas Audit, dan Risiko Audit terhadap Opini Auditor. Jurnal Akuntansi, 9(1), 63-82.

Maulana, A. (2018). Analisis pendapatan dan beban operasional dalam meningkatkan laba operasional pada pt. Kharisma pemasaran bersama nusantara (pt. Kpb nusantara) (Doctoral dissertation, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam).

Ramadhani, R., & Fatimah, S. A. (2022). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penghentian Prematur Atas Prosedur Audit Di Indonesia. Jurnal GeoEkonomi, 13(2), 211-220.

Ramadhany, A. A., Fadlilah, A. H., & Masiam, S. (2021). PROSEDUR AUDIT LAPORAN KEUANGAN PADA KANTOR AKUNTAN PUBLIK ERY DAN REKAN. Realible Accounting Journal, 1(1), 1-9.

Setiadi, S., & Sibarani, B. B. (2019). Materialitas Pada Proses Audit. JURNAL BISNIS & AKUNTANSI UNSURYA, 4(2).

Surya, U. (2022). IMPLEMENTASI MANAJEMEN MUTU PEMBELAJARAN DI MAN 1 PESISIR BARAT (Doctoral dissertation, UIN RADEN INTAN LAMPUNG).

Yuliani, W. (2018). Metode penelitian deskriptif kualitatif dalam perspektif bimbingan dan konseling. Quanta, 2(2), 83-91.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-30
Abstract views: 542 | PDF downloads: 1553