THE INFLUENCE OF IFRS S2 IMPLEMENTATION AND PERCEIVED STAKEHOLDER PRESSURE ON FIRM VALUE

Authors

  • Swee Hin Universitas Trisakti

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25170/jak.v20i1.6923

Keywords:

IFRS S2, stakeholder pressure, firm value

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the influence of IFRS S2 implementation and perceived stakeholder pressure on firm value, focusing on companies in the energy, chemical, construction materials, and plantation sectors listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) in 2024. IFRS S2 is a climate disclosure standard issued by the International Sustainability Standards Board intended to enhance the transparency of climate-related risks and opportunities. Meanwhile, perceived stakeholder pressure refers to management’s perception of external pressure from stakeholders, such as investors, regulators, customers, and the public, in encouraging corporate sustainability practices. This research employs a quantitative approach using secondary data collected from corporate annual and sustainability reports. The IFRS S2 implementation was assessed using 42 disclosure indicators grouped into four major dimensions. Meanwhile, pressure from stakeholders is measured through seven indicators that reveal the existence of external pressure. Firm value was measured using Tobin’s Q ratio. The findings reveal that both IFRS S2 implementation and perceived stakeholder pressure have a positive and significant impact on firm value, both individually and jointly. These results underscore the importance of climate-related disclosure and corporate responsiveness to stakeholder expectations in driving sustainable firm value. This study contributes to the existing literature on climate reporting and sustainability governance and offers practical implications for corporate managers and regulators. 

References

Bauer, R., & Hann, D. (2020). Corporate environmental management and credit risk. The Journal of Finance, 75(1), 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12877

Bolton, P., & Kacperczyk, M. (2021). Do investors care about carbon risk? Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 517–549.

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman Publishing.

IFRS Foundation. (2023). IFRS S2 Climate-related Disclosures. IFRS Foundation. https://www.ifrs.org

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.

Khan, M., Serafeim, G., & Yoon, A. (2016). Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality. The Accounting Review, 91(6), 1697–1724.

Kotsantonis, S., & Serafeim, G. (2022). Four things no one will tell you about ESG data. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 34(1), 50–58.

Krueger, P., Sautner, Z., & Starks, L. T. (2023). The importance of climate risks for institutional investors. Review of Financial Studies, 36(3), 1067–1111.

Liu, Y., Li, Y., & Wei, Z. (2020). Stakeholder pressure, corporate environmental responsibility, and firm performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 247, 119–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119129

Luo, L., Tang, Q., & Lan, Y. (2022). Climate risk disclosure and firm value. Accounting & Finance, 62(S1), 1–28.

Rakhman, F., & Setiawan, D. (2022). Institutional ownership and sustainability reporting quality. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 7(3), 1–15.

Serafeim, G. (2020). Social-impact efforts that create real value. Harvard Business Review, 98(5), 38–48.

Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

THE INFLUENCE OF IFRS S2 IMPLEMENTATION AND PERCEIVED STAKEHOLDER PRESSURE ON FIRM VALUE. (2026). Jurnal Akuntansi, 20(1), 033-051. https://doi.org/10.25170/jak.v20i1.6923