Promoting students’ critical thinking through reading strategy instruction in a reading class
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25170/ijelt.v11i2.1494Keywords:
critical thinking, reading strategy instruction, EFL studentsAbstract
This study examined the application of Reading Strategy Instruction (RSI) in a reading class to promote the critical thinking skills of the second language learners. It aims to find out (1) the critical thinking elements in the questions formulated by the participants before the application of RSI, and (2) the critical thinking elements found in the (a) three selected questions, (b) answers, and (c) reflections written by the participants after the application of RSI. This study included sixteen grade 11 participants of a bilingual school in Jakarta, aged between 16 to 18 years old. The participants underwent two stages (1) before the application of RSI, and (2) after the application of RSI. The RSI applied in this study was a modification of Rothstein & Santana’s (2014) “Question Formulation Technique” and Alder’s (2001) comprehension strategies in answering questions. The collected data were analysed by using the modified critical thinking indicators proposed by Mason (1991) and Henri (1992). The results of the study revealed that applying RSI in the reading class was beneficial in promoting the participants’ critical thinking skills. RSI helped the participants to (i) think differently, (ii) use prior background knowledge, (iii) question the facts given in the text, (iv) identify the issues given in the text, (v) give valid solutions to the problem, (vi) connect themselves with the text and the world, and (vii) justify their arguments using valid examples.
References
Chen, J.C. (2005). Explicit instruction of reading strategies at senior high school in Taiwan. Unpublished MA dissertation, National Kaohsiung Normal University. Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Dorkchandra, D. (2013). The effects of question generating strategy instruction on EFL freshmen’s reading comprehension and use of English tenses. Journal of Liberal Arts, 5(2), 32-45.
Estates, H. (2016, June 28). Reading is thinking. Retrieved from http://www.stephanieharvey.com/sites/default/files/RIT%202016%20Handouts.pdf
Harvey, S. (2016). Reading is thinking. Retrieved from http://www.stephanieharvey.com/sites/default/files/RIT%202016%20Handouts.pdf.
Henri, F. (1992). Computer Conferencing and Content Analysis. In A. R. Kaye (Ed.), Collaborative Learning through Computer Conferencing: The Najaden Papers (pp. 117- 136). London: Springer-Verlag.
Keene, E. & Zimmerman, S. (1997). Mosaic of Thought.Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann. Lipson, M.Y. & Wixson, K.K. (1997). Assessment & instruction: An interactive approach. New York, NY:Longman.
Mason, R. (1991). Methodologies for evaluating applications of computer conferencing in Kaye, A.R.(ed.). Collaborative Learning through Computer Conferencing: Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
Mikulecky, B., & Jeffries, L. (2004). Reading power. United States: Pearson, Longman.
Paris, S. G., Wasik, B. A., & Turner, J. C. (1991). The development of strategic readers. In R.Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research Vol. 2, 609-640. New York: Longman.
Rothstein, D., & Santana, L. (2014, October). Educational Leadership: Instruction That Sticks: The Right Questions. Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/oct14/vol72/num02/The-Right-Questions.aspx
Shihab, I.A. (2011, August). Reading as critical thinking. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.837.7726&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Sinambela, E., Manik, S., and Pangaribuan, R.E. (2015).Improving Students’s Reading Comprehension Achievement by Using K-W-L Strategy. English Linguistics Research, HKBP Nommensen University, Medan North Sumatra. Sciedu Press. (Vol. 4 , No. 3).
Wichadee, S. (2011). The effects of metacognitive strategy instruction on EFL Thai students’ reading comprehension ability. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 8(5), 31-40.
