Teaching English generic nouns: The exploration of the generic idea in English and Indonesian and the applications of explicit instruction in classroom
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25170/ijelt.v8i1.1532Keywords:
generic idea, article system, explicit instruction, explicit corrective feedbackAbstract
Although the generic idea is often expressed in discourse, the acquisition of it is so slow among learners. Moreover, this idea is expressed through a highly complex system of the English language called the article system. As a result, learners tend to make errors when they attempt to convey the generic idea in their output. Since the Indonesian language has a different way to express the generic idea, Indonesian learners of English may be interfered by their first language when expressing this idea. Consequently, errors are inevitable. A thorough examination at how the generic idea is expressed in English and in Indonesian is perhaps the only way to understand this complexity. To help learners express the idea correctly and appropriately, teachers should give explicit instruction in forms of mini lesson and explicit corrective feedback (i.e. metalinguistic feedback). This article presents all the patterns to express the generic idea both in English and Indonesian, poses some pedagogical implications and discusses some useful approaches for English teachers in dealing with it.
References
Azar, B. S. (1999). Understanding and using English grammar. New York: Pearson Education.
Celce-Murcia, M. & Larsen-Freeman, D. (1998). The grammar book: An ESL/EFL teacher’s course, 2nd Edition. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
Cowan, R. (2008). The teacher's grammar of English: A course book and reference guide. Cambridge University Press.
DeKeyser, R. (1995).Learning second language grammar rules: An experiment with a miniature linguistic system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 17, 379–410.
Diesing, M. (1992). Indefinites. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Downing, A. and Locke, P. (2006). English grammar: A university course,
2nd Edition. New York, NY: Routledge.
Ellis, R. et al. (2009). Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching (Vol. 42). Tonawanda, NY: Multilingual Matters.
Faurud, K. (1990). ‘Definiteness and the processing of noun phrases in natural discourse,’Journal of Semantics 7, 395–433.
Goldschneider, J. M. and DeKeyser, R. (2001). Explaining the ‘‘natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition’’ in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning 51, 1–50.
Hawkins, J. (1978). Definiteness and Indefiniteness: A study of reference and grammaticality prediction. London: Croon Helm.
Hawkins, J. (1991). ‘On (in)definite articles: Implicatures and (un) grammaticality prediction, ’Journal of Linguistics 27, 405–42.
Lyons, J. (1999). Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Master, P. (1987). Generic the in scientific american. English for Specific Purposes 6, 165-186.
Master, P. (1990). Teaching the English articles as a binary system. TESOL Quarterly, 24, 461–478.
Master, P. (1997). ‘The English article system: acquisition, function, and Pedagogy,’ System 25, 215–32.
Quirk, R., & S. Greenbaum. (1973). A concise grammar of contemporary English. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention: In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, (pp. 3–32).
Sneddon, J. N., Adelaar, A., Djenar, D. N., & Ewing, M. C. (2010). Indonesian reference grammar. Routledge.
Stern, S. (1977). Generic use of articles in English. Unpublished English 215 paper, UCLA, fall, 1977.
Swan, M. (1991). Practical English usage. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
Swan, M. & Smith, B. (2001). Learner English: A teacher's guide to interference and other problems. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Whitman, R. L. (1974). Teaching the article in English. TESOL Quarterly, 80(3), 253-262.
Yule, George. (1998). Explaining English grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
