Instructional aspects and test design for measuring teaching ability in content-based instruction: A case study at Ma Chung University
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25170/ijelt.v6i1.1550Keywords:
content-based instruction, test specification, teaching abilityAbstract
Content-Based Instruction (CBI) is a fertile research area which calls for more intensive studies, especially in a country where English is a foreign language. Aiming at describing a typical profile of an initial stage of CBI in a private university, this paper reports a descriptive research that identifies instructional aspects of a CBI class, and sketches a preliminary specification of a test for measuring teaching ability in CBI. Qualitative data were collected through observation of the lecture sessions, open-ended questionnaires, and interviews with the students. A vocabulary profile analysis was also done to the lecture materials. The results were used as a basis for the test specification, which was later submitted to experts who judged the contents of the test. Important aspects that emerged from the data concerned linguistic performances, task, lecturer’s assistance, and learning obstacles. Accordingly, the test specification puts special emphases on delivery technique, amount of assistance, quality of tasks and rapport with the students.
References
Babb, K.A., & Ross, C. (2009). The timing of online lecture slide availability and its effect on attendance, participation, and exam performance. Computers & Education, 52(2), 868-881.
Bachman, L.F. (2004). Statistical analyses for language assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bebenroth, R., & Redfield, M. R. (2004). Do OUE students want Content-Based Instruction: An experimental study. Osaka Keidai Ronshu, 55(4), 13-19.
Borich, G.D. (2007). Effective teaching method: Research-based practice. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Chen, Q., & Ge, G. (2007). A corpus-based lexical study on frequency and distribution of Coxhead’s AWL word families in medical research articles (RAs). English for Specific Purposes, 26(4), 502-514.
Cummins, J. (1984). Bilingualism and special education. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Davies, S. (2003). Content-based instruction in EFL contexts. The Internet TESL Journal, 9(2). Retrieved from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Davies-CBI.html.
Eskey, D. (1992). Syllabus design in content-based instruction. CATESOL Journal Special Theme: Content Based Instruction, 5(1), 11-24.
Jordan, A., Schwartz, E., & McGhie-Richmond, D. (2009). Preparing teachers for inclusive classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(2), 535-542.
Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and language learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Krashen, S. (1984). Second language acquisition and language learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Laufer, B., & Hill, M. (2000). What lexical information do L2 learners select in a call dictionary and how does it affect word retention? Language Learning & Technology, 3(2), 58-76
Lee, J.J. (2009). Size matters: An exploratory comparison of small- and large-class university lecture introductions. English for Specific Purposes, 28(4), 42-57.
Master, P. (1992). What are some considerations for teacher training in content-based instruction? CATESOL Journal Special Theme: Content Based Instruction, 5(1), 77-84.
Miller, L. (2009). Engineering lectures in a second language: what factors facilitate students’ listening comprehension? Asian EFL Journal, 11(2), 8-30.
Morris, L., & Cobb, T. (2004). Vocabulary profiles as predictors of the academic performance of Teaching English as a Second Language trainees. System, 32(5), 75-87.
Musumeci, D. (1996). Teacher-learner negotiation in Content-Based Instruction: communication at cross-purposes. Applied Linguistics, 17 (3), 286-325.
Pessoa, S., Hendry, H., Donato, R., Tucker, G.R., & Lee, H. (2007). Content-based instruction in the foreign language classroom: A discourse perspective. Foreign Language Annals, 40(1), 102-121.
Reed, B., & Railsback, J. (2003). Strategies and resources for mainstream teachers of English language learners. Northwest Regional Educational Library.
Richards, J., & Rodgers, T. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shah, M.I.A. (2003). Language learning content-based English as a second language in Malaysian classrooms. Journal of Language and Learning, 1(2). Retrievedfrom http://www.shakespeare.uk.net/
ournal/jllearn/1_2/shah.html.
Ullman, C., & Becker, A. (1997). The process and the product: involving students in choosing content and developing materials leads to change. Focus in Basics, 1(8). Retrieved from www.ncsall.net/index.php?id=430.
Vongpumivitch, V., Huang, J., & Chang, Y. (2009). Frequency analysis of the words in the Academic Word List (AWL) and non-AWL content words in applied linguistics research papers. English for Specific Purposes, 28(6), 33-41.
