Read for pleasure and acquire the language
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25170/ijelt.v5i1.1563Keywords:
the power of reading, free voluntary reading, English language teaching, literacy developmentAbstract
Despite overwhelming research evidence buttressing the power of reading (Krashen, 2004), reading for pleasure – widely known as Free Voluntary Reading (FVR) – is still excluded in the mandated national curriculum for English language teaching in Indonesia. In fact, critical voices (channeled primarily via scholarly published articles) demanding the inclusion of this kind of reading in the curriculum are almost non-existent. This shows that the power of reading in general and FVR in particular, is not acknowledged by Indonesian scholars, politicians, and language teaching practitioners. This article argues that the sluggish improvement of literacy in this country is due to the fact that English language teaching is geared to conscious learning rather than to acquisition of the language as well as to the exclusive focus on heavy and ‘serious’ literature. This article offers alternative English language pedagogy, one that is not only pleasant for the students, but also helps facilitate literacy development in a powerful way. Implications of this alternative pedagogy are discussed.
References
Lao, C., & Krashen, S.D. (2008) Do students like what is good for them? An investigation of the pleasure hypothesis with middle students of Mandarin, The International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching 4 (2), 19-20
Krashen, S. D. (1994). The pleasure hypothesis. In J. Alatis (Ed.), Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics (pp. 299-322). Washington, D.C: Georgetown University Press.
Krashen, S.D. (1989). We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: Additional evidence for the Input Hypothesis. Modern Language Journal 73, 440-464.
Krashen, S.D. (2003). Explorations in language acquisition and use. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
Krashen, S.D. (2004a). Free voluntary reading: New research, application, and controversies. Paper presented at the RELC Conference, Singapore, April 2004.
Krashen, S.D. (2004b). The power of reading (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann and Westport, CONN: Libraries Unlimited.
Krashen, S.D. (2004c). Why support a delayed-gratification approach to language education? The Language Teacher, 28 (7), 3-7.
Krashen, S. (2005). The “Decline” of reading in America, poverty, and access to books, and the use of comics in encouraging reading. Teachers College Record, February.
Rosita, E. (2006). Causes of problems in reading comprehension: A case of Indonesian learners. Unpublish paper. Atma Jaya Catholic University.
Stoltz, S. (2006). Fanfiction helps aspiring young writers. The Jakarta Post, September 10.
Sugiharto, S. (2005). Interpretation-based approach to grammar teaching: New directions in theory and practice. TEFLIN Journal, 16 (2), 172-183.
Sugiharto, S. (2007a). Reading first step to becoming better writer, The Jakarta Post, July 14.
Sugiharto, S. (2007b). Literacy campaign should start from out-class, not in-class. The Jakarta Post, September 11.
Sugiharto, S. (2008). Books, not instruction, key to creating writers, The Jakarta Post, August 23.
Witton-Davies, G. (2006). What does it take to acquire English? International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 2 (2), 2-8.
