Misinterpretations of real needs in SL and FL writing situations: Is there a need to re-evaluate directions?

Authors

  • Jayakaran Mukundan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25170/ijelt.v2i2.1600

Keywords:

compositions, culture, directions, discourse communities, learning style preferences, misinterpretations, paradigm shift, writing

Abstract

Teachers of English in Second language and foreign language situations who teach writing have had to face many challenges, some of which have come about from rapid changes in the teaching of writing in the developed nations. The dilemma that teachers face is a big one – whether to totally embrace the changes (which are advocated by these developed nations as being necessary to achieve better teaching and learning, or to adopt and adapt where necessary. This article provides the over-view of problems faced by writing teachers in SL/FL situations and provides some suggestions as to how teachers can deal with “paradigm shifts” as in the ones that have affected the field of writing.

References

Emig, J. 1971. The composing processes of twelfth graders. Urbana, IL: National Council of teachers in English
Hairston, M. 1982. The winds of change: Thomas Kuhn and the revolution in the teaching of writing. College Composition and Communication, 33, 76-78.
Horowitz, D.M. 1986. Process, not product: Less than meets the eye. TESOL Quarterly, 20/1, 141-144
Manara, C. 2006. Poetry for those who do not like poems. In J. Mukundan (Ed.), Creative writing in EFL/ESL classrooms (pp.1-7). Petaling Jaya: Pearson Malaysia
Reid, J. 1993. Teaching ESL writing. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Regents
Zamel, V. 1976. Teaching composition in the ESL classroom: What we can learn from research in the teaching of English. TESOL Quarterly, 10/1, 67-76.

Downloads

Published

2006-10-31
Abstract views: 19 | PDF downloads: 24