Analisis Hasil Survei Iklim Keselamatan dengan Menggunakan Alat Ukur Nosacq-50 di Pt. XYZ Indonesia

Authors

  • Linda Saraswati Iskandar Program Studi Program Profesi Insinyur, Fakultas Biosains, Teknologi, dan Inovasi, Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya
  • Marsellinus Bachtiar Wahyu2 Program Studi Program Profesi Insinyur, Fakultas Biosains, Teknologi, dan Inovasi, Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25170/jpk.v3i03.7375

Keywords:

Safety Climate, NOSACQ-50, Safety Maturyty

Abstract

The occupational safety climate reflects employees’ views on supervision, resources, and safety policies, which can change and indicate current safety priorities. This climate serves as a key marker of safety performance and is shaped by workers’ attitudes. On the other hand, safety culture is more enduring, representing the organization’s shared, long-term dedication to safety. Safety climate is generally evaluated using questionnaires that review policies, procedures, management commitment, communication, training, systems, behaviors, and outcomes, often employing a Likert scale with a focus on psychometric validity. According to NOSACQ-50 findings at Pt. XYZ Indonesia, the highest average score was for worker safety commitment (3.60), highlighting strong awareness and responsibility. However, lower scores for management participation (3.28) and management competence (3.32) suggest a need for greater management engagement and skill enhancement. Other aspects, like management’s prioritization of safety (3.48), perceptions of safety practices (3.35), colleague support (3.35), and confidence in safety (3.49), are at good levels but still have potential for improvement to further strengthen the safety culture.

References

Cooper, M. D., & Phillips, R. A. (2004). Exploratory analysis of the safety climate and safety behavior relationship. J Safety, 35(5), 497–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2004.08.004

Flin, R., Mearns, K., O’Connor, P., & Bryden, R. (2000). Measuring safety climate: identifying the common features. Safety Science, 34(13), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00012-6

Geller, E. S. (2005). Behavior-Based Safety and Occupational Risk Management. Sage Journals Home, 29(3), 539–561. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445504273287

Hofmann, D. A., & Stetzer, A. (1998). The Role of Safety Climate and Communication in Accident Interpretation: Implications for Learning From Negative Events. Academy of Management Journal, 41(6), 644–657. https://doi.org/10.5465/256962

International Organization for Standardization. (2018). ISO 45001:2018 Occupational health and safety management systems — Requirements with guidance for use. https://www.iso.org/standard/63787.html

Kines, P., Lappalainen, J., Mikkelsen, K. L., Olsen, E., Pousette, A., Tharaldsen, J., Tómasson, K., & Törner, M. (2011). Nordic Safety Climate Questionnaire (NOSACQ-50): A new tool for diagnosing occupational safety climate. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 41(6), 634–646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2011.08.004

Mikkelsen, K. L., & Olsen, E. (2006). Safety climate and psychosocial work environment: An integrated approach to safety and well-being. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1221–1234. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1221

Neal, A., & Griffin, M. A. (2004). Safety climate and safety at work. American Psychological Association, 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/10662-002

NOSACQ-50. (n.d.). Nordic Occupational Safety Climate Questionnaire (NOSACQ-50): Development and validation of a safety climate questionnaire. Www.Nrcwe.Dk/NOSACQ-50. Retrieved May 5, 2026, from https://www.nrcwe.dk/NOSACQ-50

O’Dea, A., & Flin, R. (2003). The role of managerial leadership in determining workplace safety outcomes. First published.

Wu, T.-C., Chen, C.-H., & Li, C.-C. (2008). A correlation among safety leadership, safety climate and safety performance. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 21(3), 307–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2007.11.001

Zohar, D. (2010). Thirty years of safety climate research: Reflections and future directions. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 42(5), 1517–1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2009.12.019

Zohar, D., & Luria, G. (2005). A Multilevel Model of Safety Climate: Cross-Level Relationships Between Organization and Group-Level Climates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4), 616–628. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.616

Downloads

Published

2026-05-07