Reviewer Guidelines

Author should send their manuscript by joining or registered the OJS. Editor in Chief will assign the manuscript to Managing Editor for further handling, and The Managing Editor will request at least two scientists to review the research article manuscript. All manuscripts are subject to double -blind peer-review, both the reviewer and author identities are concealed from the reviewers,  throughout the review process to meet standards of academic excellence. The reviewer will assess eligibility of the manuscript  and return the manuscript to the author to be revised as suggested. Within specified time the author send back the revised manuscript, and after  the manuscript has been declared eligible, the next step is editing, and scheduling for publication.  

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions. Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality. Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity. Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources. Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

(These guidelines are based on Committee On Publication Ethics (COPE)

Reviewer Guidelines

1. Login
2. Download the submission and the reviewer form
3. Upload the filled reviewer form
4. Choose the recommendation
5. Submit