PEMUTUSAN HUBUNGAN KERJA DI SUATU PERUSAHAAN YANG TIDAK BERDASARKAN DASAR HUKUM YANG TEGAS

Authors

  • Fransiskus Xaverius Dias Wahana Musik Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25170/paradigma.v4i02.1647

Keywords:

Termination of Employment, Company, Worker

Abstract

Termination of Employment (PHK) is the termination of employment because something that results in the termination of rights and obligations between workers / employers and employers is regulated in Article 1 number 25 of Law Number 13 Year 2003 concerning Manpower. In termination of employment sometimes disputes arise. These disputes tend to occur because there is no common understanding between workers / laborers and employers regarding the termination of employment relations. Settlement of PHK disputes can be carried out by Bipartite, Mediation, Conciliation, Arbitration and the Industrial Relations Court. This study aims to find out how arrangements regarding layoffs associated with severe errors made by employees. The research method used in this study is normative juridical. Data sources used in the form of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The results showed that layoffs due to gross misconduct must not be carried out unilaterally by employers but must wait for the criminal justice process until a court decision has permanent legal force and states that the employee has been legally and convincingly proven to have made a serious mistake. The legal remedies that can be done by employees who are laid off are fighting through bipartite if bipartite fails then it can go through the court. The suggestion in this study is that a company should be in termination of employment (PHK) must comply with labor laws in force in Indonesia so that there are no parties who feel disadvantaged.

Author Biography

Fransiskus Xaverius Dias, Wahana Musik Indonesia

Termination of Employment (PHK) is the termination of employment because something that results in the termination of rights and obligations between workers / employers and employers is regulated in Article 1 number 25 of Law Number 13 Year 2003 concerning Manpower. In termination of employment sometimes disputes arise. These disputes tend to occur because there is no common understanding between workers / laborers and employers regarding the termination of employment relations. Settlement of PHK disputes can be carried out by Bipartite, Mediation, Conciliation, Arbitration and the Industrial Relations Court. This study aims to find out how arrangements regarding layoffs associated with severe errors made by employees. The research method used in this study is normative juridical. Data sources used in the form of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The results showed that layoffs due to gross misconduct must not be carried out unilaterally by employers but must wait for the criminal justice process until a court decision has permanent legal force and states that the employee has been legally and convincingly proven to have made a serious mistake. The legal remedies that can be done by employees who are laid off are fighting through bipartite if bipartite fails then it can go through the court. The suggestion in this study is that a company should be in termination of employment (PHK) must comply with labor laws in force in Indonesia so that there are no parties who feel disadvantaged.

References

Buku – Buku
Agusmidah, Politik Hukum dalam Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Berdasarkan Peraturan Perundang-undangan Ketenagakerjaan, Disertasi, SPS USU, Medan 2006.
Asikin, Zainal, Dasar-dasar Hukum Perburuhan (Pengertian, Sifat dan Hakekat Hukum Perburuhan, Radja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2004.
Asyhadie, Zaeni, Hukum Kerja, Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Bidang Hubungan Kerja, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2007.
Djumadi, Hukum Perburuhan Perjanjian Kerja, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2008
Djumialdji, F.X., Perjanjian Kerja, Edisi kedua, Cetakan Pertama, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 1992.
Eggy Sudjana, Nasib dan Perjuangan Buruh di Indonesia, Renaissan, Jakarta 2005.
Friedmann W., Teori dan Filsafat Hukum, (Legal Theori), Susunan I, diterjemahkan oleh Mohamad Arifin, Cetakan kedua, Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 1993
G. Kartasapoetra, dkk, Hukum Perburuhan Pancasila Bidang Pelaksanaan Hubungan Kerja, Bandung, 1983.
G. Manulang,Sendjun Pokok-Pokok Hukum Ketenagakerjaan di Indonesia, PT Rineka Cipta, Jakarta, 1988
Hakim Abdul, Pengantar Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Indonesia Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003. Bandung, 2003.
Halim, A. Ridwan, Sari Hukum Perburuhan Aktual, Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta, 1987.
Jehani, Libertus, Hukum Ketenagakerjaan, Forum Sahabat, Jakarta, 2009.
Rawls John, A Theory of Justice, Cambridge : The Belknap Press, 1971
Mertokusumo, Sudikno Mengenal Hukum Sebagai Suatu Pengantar, Liberty, Yogyakarta, 1999
Soekanto, Soerjono, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta, 2003
Y. W Sunindhia dan Ninik Widiyanti, Masalah PHK dan Pemogokan, Bina Aksara Jakarta, 1998

Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Undang-Undang No. 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan
Undang-Undang No. 2 Tahun 2004 tentang Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 12/PUU-I/2003
Surat Edaran Menakertrans No. SE-13/MEN/SJ-HK/I/2005 tertanggal 7 Januari 2005 (“SE Menakertrans”) tentang Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Atas Hak Uji material Undang - Undang No.13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan Terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia
Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung No. 3 Tahun 2015 tentang Pemberlakuan Rumusan Hasil Rapat Pleno Tahun 2015

Downloads

Published

2020-05-31
Abstract views: 222 | PDF downloads: 643