The Moral Reading of HIV Prevention in the United States: Criminal Law and Tort Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25170/paradigma.v6i02.2644Kata Kunci:
criminal law, tort law, HIVAbstrak
The United States government has been campaigning to encourage people to take HIV testing and thus get treated. It is puzzling that more than 50% of States have HIV-specific criminal laws that criminalize both exposure and transmission. At the same time, there is an increased tort law to seek financial compensation for unwanted HIV exposure and transmission. While both laws the moral claim of protecting people from HIV infection, this paper is trying to find an answer to the following inquiry: What is the difference of the moral reading between the use of criminal law and tort law in addressing HIV prevention in the United States? This paper uses the traditional descriptive comparison between criminal law and tort law under the American legal system with a nationwide jurisdictional scope. This paper measures the difference using the frame of reference of Ronald Dworkin's law, morality, and interpretation theory. Both criminal law and tort law have been developing similar liability principles regarding HIV exposure and transmission under the United States' common law tradition. For HIV prevention itself, both criminal law and tort law play a marginal role in gaining public health purposes in reversing the HIV epidemic. Criminal law has been scrutinized as not aligned with the purpose of law where misconceptions exist in both substantive dimension and the underlying moral claim. Tort law, on the other hand, suffers an even less moral claim on public health purposes. However, tort law maintains a consistent narrow sense of financial liability.
Referensi
The National HIV/AIDS Strategy | High-Impact HIV Prevention | Policy and Law | HIV/AIDS | CDC, https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/policies/hip/strategy.html (last visited Mar 16, 2017).
Report, http://www.hivlawcommission.org/index.php/report (last visited Mar 16, 2017).
Graham White, Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (Prep) and Criminal Liability Under State HIV Laws, 126 YALE L.J. FORUM 77, 77 (2016).
White, supra note 1 at 77.
Heindel, supra note 2 at 35; See Zita Lazzarini, Sarah Bray & Scott Burris, Evaluating the Impact of Criminal Laws on HIV Risk Behavior, 30 J.L. Med. & Ethics 239, 239 (2002).
WASH. REV. CODE ANN. § 9A.36.011 (West)
State v. Whitfield, 132 Wash. App. 878, 899, 134 P.3d 1203, 1215 (2006).
State v. Stark, 66 Wash. App. 423, 433, 832 P.2d 109, 114 (1992).
State v. Shelley, 85 Wash. App. 24, 929 P.2d 489 (1997).
State v. Whitfield, 132 Wash. App. 878, 899, 134 P.3d 1203, 1215 (2006).
IOWA CODE ANN. § 709D.3 (West).
MINN. STAT. ANN. § 609.2241 (West).
Brian Cox, Turning the Tide: The Future of HIV Criminalization After Rhoades v. State and Legislative Reform in Iowa, 11 NW. J. L. & SOC. POL'Y 1 (2016); See HIV Transmission, Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/basics/transmission.html (last updated Nov. 10, 2016).
Restatement (Second) of Torts § 13 (1977). Sun Goo Lee, Tort Liability and Public Health: Marginal Effect of Tort Law on HIV Prevention, 54 S. TEX. L. REV. 639, 684 (2013).
Brzoska v. Olson, 668 A.2d 1355, 1361 (Del. 1995).
Delay v. Delay, 707 So. 2d 400, 402 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998); Neal v. Neal, 873 P.2d 871, 876-77 (Idaho 1994); Robinson v. Louie (In re Louie), 213 B.R. 754, 764 (Bankr. N.D. Cal. 1997).
Doe v. Johnson, 817 F. Supp. 1382, 1384-85 (W.D. Mich. 1993).
Louie (In re Louie), 213 B.R. at 763; Brzoska, 668 A.2d at 1359-60; Martinez v. Brazen, No. 91 Civ. 7769 (RPP), 1992 WL 93245, at 1 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 22, 1992); Neal, 873 P.2d at 876-77.
Restatement (Second) of Torts,supra note 15, § 525.
Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Sheft, 989 F.2d 1105, 1108 (9th Cir. 1993); Baranowski v. Torre, No. CV90-0236178, 1991 WL 240460, at 2 (Conn. Super. Ct. Nov. 7, 1991); Brzoska, 668 A.2d at 1367; Doe v. Dilling, 888 N.E.2d 24, 39-40 (Ill. 2008); J.B. v. Bohonovsky, 835 F. Supp. 796, 797 (D.N.J. 1993); Louie (In re Louie), 213 B.R. at 758, 761; Petri v. Bank of N.Y. Co., 582 N.Y.S.2d 608, 613 (Sup. Ct. 1992); Johnson, 817 F. Supp. at 1388-89.
Brzoska, 668 A.2d at 1367
Michelle Oberman,Sex, Lies, and the Duty to Disclose, 47Ariz. L. Rev.871, 892 (2005)
Doe v. Doe, 519 N.Y.S.2d 595, 596-97 (Sup. Ct. 1987).
Eric M. Larsson & Jean A. Talbot, Cause of Action to Recover Damages for Transmission of AIDS Through Negligence, Misrepresentation or Nondisclosure of Infected Status, 39 Causes of Action 2d 211 § 15, at 244, § 16, at 245 (2009).
Hughes Training Inc. v. Cook, 254 F.3d 588, 594 (5th Cir. 2001).
Whelan v. Whelan, 588 A.2d 251, 253 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1991).
Whelan, 588 A.2d at 252.
Mandana Shahvari, Comment, AfrAIDS: Fear of AIDS as a Cause of Action, 67Temp. L. Rev. 769, 782 (1994).
Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Sheft, 989 F.2d 1105, 1106 (9th Cir. 1993).
Robinson v. Louie (In reLouie), 213 B.R. 754, 759 (Bankr. N.D. Cal. 1997); Kerins v. Hartley, 33 Cal. Rptr. 2d 172, 179-80 (Ct. App. 1994); Petri v. Bank of N.Y. Co., 582 N.Y.S.2d 608, 613-14 (Sup. Ct. 1992).
Dan B. Dobbs, The Law of Torts § 1, at 2 (2000).
Richard Carl Schoenstein, Note, Standards of Conduct, Multiple Defendants, and Full Recovery of Damages in Tort Liability for the Transmission of Human Immunodeficiency Virus, 18 Hofstra L. Rev. 37, 50 (1989).
Sun Goo Lee, Tort Liability and Public Health: Marginal Effect of Tort Law on HIV Prevention, 54 S. Tex. L. Rev. 639, 653 (2013).
John B. v. Superior Court, 137 P.3d 153, 160 (Cal. 2006).
Doe v. Johnson, 817 F. Supp. 1382, 1382 (W.D. Mich. 1993).
Plaza v. Wisser, 626 N.Y.S.2d 446 (Sup. Ct. 1995).
N.Y. Pub. Health Law§ 2785(2) (McKinney 2013).
Plaza, 626 N.Y.S.2d at 454.
Petri v. Bank of N.Y. Co., 582 N.Y.S.2d 608, 613-14 (Sup. Ct. 1992).
Laurel Sprague & Sean Strub,The SERO Project: National Criminalization Survey, Preliminary Results, The Sero Project (July 25, 2012), http://seroproject.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Sero-Preliminary-Data-Report_Final.pdf.
Scott Burris, et al.,Do Criminal Laws Influence HIV Risk Behavior? An Empirical Trial, 39Ariz. St. L.J. 467, 467 (2007).
DOUGLAS HUSAK, OVERCRIMINALIZATION: THE LIMITS OF THE CRIMINAL LAW 92 (2008).
ANDREW VON HIRSCH & ANDREW ASHWORTH, PROPORTIONATE SENTENCING: EXPLORING THE PRINCIPLES 134 (2005).
RONALD DWORKIN, LAW’S EMPIRE 79 (1986).
Carol L. Galletly et. al.,HIV-Positive Persons' Awareness and Understanding of Their State's Criminal HIV Disclosure Law, 13AIDS & Behavior 1262, 1262 (2009).
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Diperbolehkan atau tidak mempublikasikan tulisan di resopitory instansi penulis
