Gerak-Ganda: Sebuah Pemecahan Etis Atas Konsep Pasar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25170/respons.v15i02.571Kata Kunci:
gerak-ganda, kapitalisme, komodifikasi, pasar yang swatata, sosialisme ekonomi, double-movement, capitalism, comodification, self-regulating market, economic socialismAbstrak
Selain gagasan ketertanaman ekonomi dalam konteks sosial, Karl Polanyi
dikenal luas melalui gagasannya mengenai gerak-ganda. Gagasan ini menekankan
bahwa di balik perkembangan liberalisme ekonomi terdapat proteksi sosial sebagai
sebuah gerakan positif untuk melindungi masyarakat dari sistem ekonomi apa pun
yang disruptif. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menyajikan tesis ini dalam 3 tahap, yakni:
konteks sosial munculnya The Great Transformation, gagasan gerak-ganda itu sendiri,
dan relevansinya dalam konteks globalisasi ekonomi.
Beside the concept of embedded economy, Karl Polanyi is well known through
his concept of double-movement. The concept emphasizes that behind the progress of economic
liberalism emerges the social protection as the positive movement. This movement
implies that society has its collective self-rule and decision making
that will protect itself
from all disruptive economic system. This article aims to extend this thesis into three stages
that are: historical background the Great Transformation, the idea of double-movement,
and its relevance in the new context of economic globalization.
Referensi
Queen’s University Press
Beckert, Jens (2006). ”Interpenetration versus Embededdness: The Premature
Dismissal of Talcott Parsons in the New Economic Sociology”, The
American Journal of Economics and Sociology. Vol. 65, issue 1
Block, Fred et.al. June (2003). ”In the Shadow of Speenhamland,” Politics and
Society, Vol.31, No.2: hal.1-41.
Blyth, Mark. (2002). Great Transformations Economic Ideas and Institutional
Change in the Twentieth Century. USA: Cambridge University Press.
Bugra, Asye and Agartan, Kaan. (2007). Reading Karl Polanyi for the Twenty-
First Century Market Economy as a Political Project. New York: Palgrave
Macmillan.
Dale, Gareth. (2010). Karl Polanyi The Limit of Market, Polity Press, London,
2010
Dalton, George. (1968). Primitive Archaic and Modern Economies: Essay of Karl
Polanyi. Anchor.
Gemici, Kurtuluş (2008). ”Karl Polanyi and The Antinomies of Embeddedness,”
Socio-Economic Review: hal. 5-33
Hann, Chris and Hart, Keith. (2009). Market and Society: the Great Transformation
Today. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hecter, Michael. (1981). ”Karl Polanyi’s Social Theory: A Critique,” Politics Society,
Vol.10.
Polanyi, Karl, Lewis, John, and Kitchin Donald K. (Eds). (1936). Christianity and
the Social Revolution , New York,1936
Polanyi, Karl, (2001). The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic
Origins of Our Times, Beacon Press,2001 (asli,1944)
Polanyi, Karl, Arensberg, and Pearson. (Eds). (1957). Trade and Market in The
Early Empires, Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Polanyi, Karl. (1966). Dahomey and the Slave Trade. Washington: The University
of Washington Press.
Swedberg. R. et.al. (1992).The Sociology of Economic Life. Boulder: Westview
Press.
Swedberg, Richard. (1997). ”New Economic Sociology: What Has Been Accomplished,
What is Ahead?” Acta Sociologica, Vol.40.
