WHISTLEBLOWING PELECEHAN SEKSUAL DI TEMPAT KERJA: DIFERENSIASI ANTARA PRIA DAN WANITA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25170/jm.v19i2.3517Keywords:
Keywords: sexual harassment; job insecurity; whistleblowing; organizational citizenship behaviorAbstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of job insecurity and organizational citizenship behavior on the intention to become whistleblowing. To obtain sufficient statistical results, this research uses 48 respondents who have knowledge of cases of sexual harassment that occurred in the organization where they work. To examine the relationship between constructs and the potential differences in perceptions that exist, the researchers used a path analysis technique assisted by the Smart PLS version 3. The results showed that the constructs of job insecurity and organizational citizenship behavior had a significant impact in shaping intentions to become whistleblowers in cases of sexual harassment in Indonesia. organization where they work. However, there are differences in perception between male and female workers in reporting these acts of sexual harassment
Keywords: sexual harassment; job insecurity; whistleblowing; organizational citizenship behavior
References
financial incentives and perception of seriousness on whistleblowing intention. Journal of Business Ethics, 151, 165 – 178.
Culliberg, B., & Mihelic, K.K. (2016). The evolution of whistleblowing studies: a critical
review and research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics, 146, 787 – 803.
Dasgupta, S., & Kesharwani, A. (2010). Whistleblowing : a survey of literature. International
Journal Corporate Governance, 9, 57 – 70.
DeCanio, S.J. (2016). Robots and human – complements or substitutes? Journal of Macro
Economy, 49, 280 – 291.
De Witte, H., Pienaar, J., & De Cuyper, N. (2016). Review of 30 years of longitudinal studies
on the association between job insecurity and health and well – being : is there casual evidence? Australian Psychology, 51, 18 - 31
Erat, S., Kitapci, H,, & Comez, P. (2017). The effect of organizational load on workstress,
emotional commitment, and turnover intention. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 6, 221 – 231.
Erturk, A. (2016). The relationship between whistleblowing and organizational citizenship
behavior for high school teacher. Journal of Educational Sciences, 6(1), 1-22.
Fitzgerald, L.F., Gelfand, M.J., & Drasgow, F. (1995). Measuring sexual harassment :
theoretical and psychometric advances. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17(4), 425 – 445.
Gao, J., Greenberg, R., & Wing On Wing, B. (2015). Whistleblowing intention of lower level
employees: the effect of reporting channel, bystanders and wrong doing power status. Journal of Business Ethics, 126, 85 – 99.
He, P., Jiang, C., Xu, Z., & Shen, C. (2021). Knowledge hiding : current research and future
research direction. Front Psychological, 12, 237.
Hutagalung, I., & Ishak. (2012). Sexual harassment : a predictor to job satisfaction and work
stress among women employees. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Science, 65, 723 – 730.
Khan, J., Saeed, I., Zada, M., Ali A., Barraza, N.C., Sepulveda, G.S., & Mufioz, A.V. (2022).
Examining whistleblowing intention : the influence of rationalization on wrongdoin and threat of retaliation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(1752).
Latan, H., Ringle, C.M., & Jabbour, C.J.C. (2016). Whistleblowing intention among public
accountants in Indonesia : testing for the moderation effects. Journal of Business Ethics, 152, 573 – 588.
Miceli, M.P., Near, J.P., & Schwenk, C.P. (1991). Who blows the whistle and why? Industrial
and Labor Relations Review, 45, 113 – 130
McLaughlin, H., Uggen, C., & Blackstone, A. (2012). Sexual harassment, workplace authority
and the paradox of power. American Sociological Review, 20(10), 1 - 23
Near, J.P., & Miceli, M.P. (1985). Organizational dissidence: the case of whistle-blowing.
Journal of Business Ethics, 4, 1 – 16.
Near, J.P., & Miceli, M.P. (2016). After the wrongdoing: what managers should know about
whistleblowing. Business Horizon, 59, 105 – 114.
Organ, D.W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior : the good soldier syndrome. Lexington :
Lexington Books.
Ozdemir, M. (2013). The relationship of organizational corruption with organizational dissent
and whistleblowing in turkish schools. Cukurova University of Education Journal, 42(1),74 – 84.
Ozsoy, N., & Beduk, A. (2015). The relationship between whistleblowing and organizational
citizenship behavior. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social
Science, 5(4), 193 - 203
Phaiyarom, M., & Chuemchit, M. (2020). Sex in the city: sexual risk behaviors and sexual
harassment among female beer promoters in Chiang Mai province, Thailand. Journal of Health Research, 34(2), 168 – 178.
Seckin, Z., & Karasoy, H.A. (2012). A conceptual study on the relationship between the
importance of whistleblowing and organizational citizenship behavior. International Journal of Information Technology and Business Management, 6(1),50 – 58.
Sehgal, P. (2014). Whistleblower : traitors or heroes? A global perspective. Proceedings of 26th
International Business Research Conference Imperial College London, pp. 1 – 12.
Shin,Y., Hur, W.M., Moon, T.W., & Lee, S.A. (2019). A motivational perspective on job
insecurity: relationship between job insecurity, intrinsic motivation, and performance behavioral outctomes. International Journal of Environment Public Health, Vol. 16.
Shoss, M.K. (2017). An integrative review and agenda for future research. Journal of
Management, 43, 1911 – 1939.
Soelton, M., Amaelia, P., & Prasetyo, H. (2019). Dealing with job insecurity, work stress, and
family conflict of employees. Advances in Economic, Business, and Management Research, 120, 167 – 174.
Sverke, M., Lastad, L., Hellgreen, J., & Richter, A. (2019). A meta analysis of job insecurity
and employee performace: testing temporal aspect, rating source, welfare regime and union density as moderators. International Journal of Environment Public Health, 16, 2536.
Tamir, M., Schwartz, S.H., Oishi, S., & Kim, M.Y. (2017). The secret to happiness : feeling
good or feeling right? Journal of Experiemental of Psychology, 146, 1448 – 1459.
Toker, A. (2013). Relationship between whistleblowing and job satisfaction and
organizational loyalty at schools in Turkey. Educational Research and Reviews, 8(14), 1186 – 1187.
Van der Elst, T., De Cuyper, N., Baillien, E., Niesen, W., & De Witte, H. (2016). Perceived
control and psychological contract breach as explantion of the relationship between job insecurity, job strain, and coping reaction: towards a theoretical integration. Stress Heal, 32, 100 – 116.
Wainberg, J., & Perreault, S. (2016). Whistleblowing in audit firms: do explicit protection
from retaliation activate implicit threats of reprisal? Behavioral Research of Accounting, 28, 83 – 93
Williams, K.B. (2012). A social psychological model for predicting sexual harassment. Journal
of Social Issues, 51(1), 69 – 84.
Webber, G., Spitzer, D., Somrongthong, R., Dat, T.C., & Kounnavongsa, S. (2012).
Facilitators and barriers to accessing reproductive health care for migrant beer promoters in Cambodia, Laos, Thailand and Vietnam. Globalization Health, 8(1), 21 – 38.
Yilmaz, K., Altinkurt, Y., & Yildinm, H. (2015). The effect of gender, seniority, and subject
matter variables on teacher organizational citizenship behavior in Turkey. Education and Science, 40, 285 – 304.
Zhang, P. (2019). Automation, wage inequality and implication of a robot tax. International
Review of Economy and Finance, 59, 500 - 509
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Yovita Mumpuni Hartarini, Ignatius Hari Santoso, Sopi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access).
