Meningkatkan Green Purchasing Behavior di Kota Kupang: Peran Green Perceived Value, Green Perceived Risk, dan Green Perceived Trust
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25170/jm.v21i1.4764Keywords:
low price sensitivity, social influence, green perceived value, green purchasing behaviorAbstract
The aim of this study is to develop a preliminary framework to explore the ecological influence of perceived ecological value, perceived risk, social influence, and low price sensitivity on environmentally friendly purchase intentions and discuss the mediating role of environmentally friendly beliefs. Furthermore, this research uses empirical research through a questionnaire survey method to verify the hypothesis and explore its managerial potential. Data processing uses structural equation modeling (SEM) to verify the research framework. Empirical results show that awareness of environmentally friendly values, social influence and sensitivity to low prices have a positive impact on environmentally friendly beliefs and environmentally friendly purchasing intentions, while green ro risk perception has no impact at all. Furthermore, this research shows that the relationship between green purchase intentions and perceived green value is moderated by green beliefs. Therefore, invest resources to increase the perceived value of environmental compassion to increase environmental compassion beliefs and environmentally friendly purchasing intentions. This study summarizes the literature on green marketing and relationship marketing within a new management framework of green purchase intentions. This study uses five new concepts – perceived green value, social influence, low price sensitivity, green beliefs, and green purchase intentions – to develop an original research framework for increasing green shopping intentions. Although previous research has highlighted issues related to purchasing intentions, no research has yet explored issues related to environmentally friendly management. Therefore, this article builds a research framework to address green purchase intentions.
References
Aaker, D. A. (1996). Measuring Brand Equity Across Products and Markets. California Management Review, 38(3), 102–120. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165845
Amaral, M. A. L., & Djuang, G. (2023). Relationship Between Social Influence , Shopping Lifestyle , and Impulsive Buying on Purchase Intention of Preloved Products Management Department , Faculty of Economics & Business , Widya Mandira Catholic University. Kinerja, 27(1), 91–106. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24002/kinerja.v27i1.6635
Amaral, M. A. L., Goetha, S., Watu, E. G. C., & Fallo, A. (2021). Faktor-Faktor Pembentuk Perilaku Pelanggan “Pinnochio” Di Kupang. Jurnal Manajemen, 17(2), 98–114. https://doi.org/10.25170/jm.v17i2.1844
Bhatia, M., & Jain, A. (2014). Green Marketing: A Study of Consumer Perception and Preferences in India. Electronic Green Journal, 1(36). https://doi.org/10.5070/g313618392
Cai, H., Tu, B., Ma, J., Chen, L., Fu, L., Jiang, Y., & Zhuang, Q. (2020). Psychological impact and coping strategies of frontline medical staff in Hunan between January and March 2020 during the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID) in Hubei, China. Medical Science Monitor, 26, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.924171
Chang, H. H., & Chen, S. W. (2008). The impact of online store environment cues on purchase intention: Trust and perceived risk as a mediator. Online Information Review, 32(6), 818–841. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520810923953
Chaudhuri, A. (1997). Consumption Emotion and Perceived Risk: A Macro-Analytic Approach. Journal of Business Research, 39(2), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(96)00144-0
Chen, Y. S. (2010). The drivers of green brand equity: Green brand image, green satisfaction, and green trust. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(2), 307–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0223-9
Cho, M., Bonn, M. A., & Li, J. (Justin). (2019). Differences in perceptions about food delivery apps between single-person and multi-person households. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 77(February), 108–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.06.019
Dam, T. C. (2020). Influence of Brand Trust, Perceived Value on Brand Preference and Purchase Intention. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(10), 939–947. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no10.939
Dewi, W. W. A., Avicenna, F., & Prasetyo, A. A. P. S. (2022). The Effect Of Social Influence On Green Purchasing Behavior On The Purchase Of Love Beauty And Planet Brand Products. Proceeding 2nd International Conference on Communication Science (ICCS, 470–476.
Essoussi, L. H., & Linton, J. D. (2010). New or recycled products: How much are consumers willing to pay? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 27(5), 458–468. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363761011063358
Eze, U. C., & Ndubisi, N. O. (2013). Green Buyer Behavior: Evidence from Asia Consumers. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 48(4), 413–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909613493602
Fahik, A. S., Musika, A., Roga, M. D. T., Fallo, A., Djuang, G., & Amaral, M. A. L. (2023). Keputusan Pembelian Kembali: Kepedulian Konsumen Terhadap Produk Ramah Lingkungan. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 3(4), 3818–3831.
Fraj, E., & Martinez, E. (2006). Environmental values and lifestyles as determining factors of ecological consumer behaviour: An empirical analysis. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23(3), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760610663295
Gomes, S., Lopes, J. M., & Nogueira, S. (2023). Willingness to pay more for green products: A critical challenge for Gen Z. Journal of Cleaner Production, 390(January). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136092
Gupta, S., & Ogden, D. T. (2009). To Buy or Not to Buy? A Social Dilemma Perspective on Green Buying. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 26(6), 378–393. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760910988201
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed). Pearson Prentice Hall.
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 414–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0261-6
Han, H. (2021). Consumer behavior and environmental sustainability in tourism and hospitality: a review of theories, concepts, and latest research. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 29(7), 1021–1042. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2021.1903019
Hsieh, A. T., & Chang, W. T. (2004). The Effect of Advertising on Consumer Price Sensitivity. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 38(2), 119–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378502200202
Jayaraman, K., Yun, W. W., Seo, Y. W., & Joo, H. Y. (2015). Customers’ reflections on the intention to purchase hybrid cars: An empirical study from Malaysia. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 13(2), 304–312.
Kang, S. (2014). Factors influencing intention of mobile application use. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 12(4), 360–379. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMC.2014.063653
Kazi, A. K., & Mannan, M. A. (2013). Factors Affecting Adoption of Mobile Banking in Pakistan. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), 2(3), 54–61. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v2i3.73
Khoiruman, M., & Haryanto, A. T. (2017). Green Purchasing Behavior Analysis of Government Policy About Paid Plastic Bags. Indonesian Journal of Sustainability Accounting and Management, 1(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.28992/ijsam.v1i1.25
Lejap, H. H. T., Amaral, M. A. L., Goetha, S., Watu, E. G. C., & Fallo, A. (2021). Determinant Factors of Mobile Banking Usage: Case Study in Kupang, East Nusa Tenggara. Jurnal REP (Riset Ekonomi Pembangunan), 6(2), 232–250. https://doi.org/10.31002/rep.v6i2.5457
Manuleus, Y. (2022, April 19). Warning! Sampah di Kota Kupang Capai 218.98 Ton Per Hari. Victory News.
Minarti, I., Niha, S. S., Augustin, M., & Amaral, L. (2022). Pengaruh Kepercayaan Dan Persepsi Risiko Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Online Produk Pada E-Commerce Tokopedia Di Kota Kupang Yang Dimediasi Minat Beli. Pembangunan Ekonomi Berkelanjutan Pasca Pandemi Covid-19: Membaca Peluang Dan Tantangan, September, 406–421. https://journal.untidar.ac.id/index.php/semnasfe/article/view/545
Mitchell, A. A., & Dacin, P. A. (1996). The assessment of alternative measures of consumer expertise. Journal of Consumer Research, 23(3), 219–239. https://doi.org/10.1086/209479
Moore, M., & Carpenter, J. (2006). The effect of price as a marketplace cue on retail patronage. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 15(4), 265–271. https://doi.org/10.1108/10610420610679647
Mun, Y. P., Khalid, H., & Nadarajah, D. (2017). Millennials’ Perception on Mobile Payment Services in Malaysia. Procedia Computer Science, 124, 397–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.12.170
Novelino, A. (2022). Sampah Plastik 2021 Naik ke 11,6 Juta Ton, KLHK Sindir Belanja Online. CNN Indonesia. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20220225173203-20-764215/sampah-plastik-2021-naik-ke-116-juta-ton-klhk-sindir-belanja-online
Oliver, J. D., & Lee, S. H. (2010). Hybrid car purchase intentions: A cross-cultural analysis. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 27(2), 96–103. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363761011027204
Pratama, M. A. (2014). Pengaruh Green Perceived Value, Green Perceived Risk Dan Green Trust Terhadap Green Purchase Intention Lampu Philips LED di Surabaya M. Ashar Pratama. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Universitas Surabaya, 3(1), 1–20. https://journal.ubaya.ac.id/index.php/jimus/article/view/1564
Putro, H., & Haryanto, B. (2015). Factors Affecting Purchase Intention of Online Shopping in Zalora Indonesia. British Journal of Economics, Management & Trade, 9(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJEMT/2015/18704
Saman, M. F., Djuang, G., Augustin, M., & Amaral, L. (2022). Pengaruh Word of Mouth (WOM), Pribadi dan Psikologi Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Unknown Cash (UC) Pada Game Player Unknowon ’ s Battle Grounds (PUBG) Mobile di Kota Kupang. Pembangunan Ekonomi Berkelanjutan Pasca Pandemi Covid-19: Membaca Peluang Dan Tantangan, September, 379–390. https://journal.untidar.ac.id/index.php/semnasfe/article/view/543/158
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2013). Research Methods for Business. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2019). Metode Penelitian Untuk Bisnis (6th ed.). Salemba Empat.
Sia Niha, S., Lopes Amaral, M. A., & Tisu, R. (2022). Factors Influencing Behavior to Reducing Household Food Waste in Indonesia. Kinerja, 26(1), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.24002/kinerja.v26i1.5493
Syaharani, E. P., & Mayangsari, S. (2022). Pengaruh E-Commerce, Penggunaan Sistem Informasi Akuntansi, Ketersediaan Modal, Dan Dukungan Keluarga Dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Untuk Berwirausaha Pada Mahasiswa Akuntansi. Jurnal Ekonomi Trisakti, 2(2), 1189–1202. https://doi.org/10.25105/jet.v2i2.14781
Takele, Y., & Sira, Z. (2011). Analysis of Factors Influencing Customers’ Intention to the Adoption of E-Banking Service Channels in Bahir Dar City: An Integration of TAM, TPB AND PR. International Arab Journal of E-Technology, 2(1), 56–64.
Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Service Quality, Profitability, and The Economic Worth of Customers : What We Know and What We Need to Learn. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 28(1), 67–85.
Zeithmal, V. (2001). Service Quality , Profitability , and the Economic Worth of Customers : What We Know and What We Need to Learn Service Quality , Profitability , and the Economic Worth of Customers : What We Know and What We Need to Learn. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(1), 67–85.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Maria Augustin Lopes Amaral, Jou Sewa Adrianus, Engelbertus G. Ch. Watu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access).
