Negotiation of meaning in communicative tasks

Authors

  • - Luciana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25170/ijelt.v1i1.1406

Keywords:

negotiation of meaning, communicative tasks

Abstract

The adoption of task-based teaching in Indonesia classrooms has not been widely accepted for two major grounds. First, teachers seem to cast some doubts as to what degree such an approach can contribute to their students’ language development. Second, classroom management issues, such as discipline and noise become another challenge to cope with. While these issues deserve serious attention, teachers’ unwillingness to venture the use of tasks seems to put their awareness of the learning process at stake. It is through task-based teaching, students’ language development can be nurtured. This study is an attempt to probe the benefits of using two types of communicative tasks: picture comparison and picture drawing. The study involving two female Taiwanese native speakers learning English found that the interactional mechanisms created through a task and, negotiation of meaning provided a potentially rich forum for students’ language development. There are at least two prime elements accounting for this benefit. First, the type of direct indicators employed by the student creates linguistic urgency fostering the limit of their language capacity, and the use of embedded negotiation of meaning promotes students’ active involvement. Second, one way communicative tasks, to some degree, can yield greater opportunities for students to negotiate, thus enriching acquisition.

References

Ellis, R. 1984. Classroom second language development. Oxford: Pergamon Press
Ellis, R, Y. Tanaka, & A. Yamazaki. 1994. Classroom interaction, comprehension, and the acquisition of L2 word meanings. Language learning 44/3, 449-491.
Foster, P. 1998. A classroom perspective on the negotiation of meaning Applied linguistic 19/ 1, 1-23.
Gass, S.M. 1997. Input, interaction and the second language learner.
Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gass, S.M. & E.M Varonis. 1985. Task variation and nonnative/nonnative negotiation of meaning. In S.M. Gass & C.G. Madden (Eds.) Input in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Newbury House Publishers.
Long, M.H. 1981. Input, interaction, and second language acquisition. In Harris Winitz (Ed.) Native language and foreign language acquisition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. Volume 379.
Long, M.H. 1983a. Native speaker/nonnative speaker conversation and the Negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied linguistics 4, 126-41.
Long, M.H. 1983b. Linguistic and conversational adjustments to non-native speakers. Studies in second language acquisition 5/2, 177-193.
Pica, T. 1987. Second language acquisition, social interaction and the Classroom. Applied linguistics 8/1, 3-21.
Pica, T. 1994. Research on negotiation: what does it reveal about second language learning conditions, processes and outcomes? Language learning 44/3, 493-527.
Pica, T. & C. Doughty. 1985. The role of groupwork in classroom second language acquisition. Studies in second language acquisition 7/2.
Pica, T., R. Young, & C. Doughty. 1987. The impact of interaction on comprehension. TESOL Quarterly 21/4, 737-758.
Richards, J.C. & T.S. Rodgers. 2002. Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rivers, W. 1987. Interaction language teaching. London: Cambridge University Press.
Seedhouse, P. 1999. Task-based interaction. ELT Journal 53/3, 149-155.
Skehan, P. 1996. Second language acquisition research and task-based instruction. In Jane Willis & Dave Willis (Eds.) Challenge and change in language teaching. Oxford: Heinemann.
Varonis, E.M. and S. Gass. 1982. The comprehensibility of non-native speech. Studies in second language acquisition 4/2, 115-134.
Varonis, E.M. & S. Gass. 1985. Non-native/non-native conversations: a model for negotiation of meaning. Applied linguistics 6, 71-89.
Willis, J. 1996. A flexible framework for task-based learning. In Jane Willis & Dave Willis (Eds.) Challenge and change in language teaching. Oxford: Heinemann.

Downloads

Published

2005-05-23
Abstract views: 40 | PDF downloads: 31