“Why my students didn’t read according to their level?”: An instructor’s reflection in an extensive reading class

Authors

  • Nugrahenny T. Zacharias

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25170/ijelt.v11i1.1488

Keywords:

Reflection, Extensive reading, critical incident, reading level and comfort zones

Abstract

The present paper is a novice teacher reflection in an Extensive Reading (ER) course. It attempts to explore the extent to which reflecting on critical incident of a reading level contributes to new understanding of Day and Bamford’s ER principles utilized to design the course. This study found that reflection through critical incidents provides a systematic structure to develop practical pedaogigcal knowledge into teaching. By exercising a critical incident reflection on ER, I was able to critically contextualize Day and Bamford’s ER principles into my current teaching context. It concludes by pointing out how a narrative reflection on critical incidents is needed to understand a novice teacher’s experience when practicing a new approach in teaching.

References

Canagarajah, A.S. (2012). Teacher development in a global profession: An autoethnography. TESOL Quarterly, 46(2), 258-279.
Cher, S. (2011). Beginner students and extensive reading. Research Notes, 44:34-39
Day, R.R. and Bamford, J. (2004) (Ed.) Extensive reading activities for language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Day, R. R. (2003). What is extensive reading? Teacher Talk, 21, 1-2.
Day, R. R. and Bamford, J. (1998). Extensive reading in the second language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Farrell, T. S. C. (2006). Reflective practice in action: A case study of a writing teacher’s reflections on practice. TESOL Canada Journal, 23(2), 77-90.
Farrell, T. S. C. (2008). Critical incidents in ELT initial teacher training. ELT Journal, 62(1), 3-10.
Farrell, T. S. C. (2013). Critical incident analysis through narrative reflective practice: A case study. Iranian Journal of Teaching Research, 1(1), 79-89.
Hill, D. R. (2013). Graded readers. ELT Journal, 67(1), 85-125.
Johnson, K. (2011). What makes a good teacher? Studying expertise in teaching skills. The Language Teacher, 35(4), 42-43.
Khandelwal, K.A. Effective teaching behaviors in the college classroom: A critical incident technique from students’ perspective. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 21(3), 299-309.
Marsh, H.W., & Dunkin, M. J. (1997). Students’ evaluation of university teaching: A multidimensional perspective. In R.P.Perry and J.C. Smart (Eds.), Effective teaching in higher education: Research and practice (pp. 241-320). New York, NY: Agathon Press.
Measor, L. (2005). Critical incidents in the classroom: Identities, choices and careers. In S. J. Ball and I. F. Goodson (Ed.), Teacher’s lives and careers (pp. 63-78). Philadelphia: Taylor and Francis.
McCabe, A. (2002). A wellspring for development. In J. Edge (Ed.), Continuing professional development (pp. 82-96). Whistable, UK: IATEFL Publication.
Razali, N. (1992). ESL in Malaysia: Looking beyond the classroom. The English Teacher. XXI October 1992. Selangor: MELTA.
Richards, J.C. & Farrell, T.S.C. (2005). Professional development for language teachers: Strategies for teacher learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schmidt, K. (2004). Find your level. In R.R. Day and J. Bamford (Eds.), Extensive reading activities for teaching language (pp. 31-34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thiel, T. (1999). Reflections on critical incidents. Prospect, 14, 44-52.

Downloads

Published

2016-05-31
Abstract views: 45 | PDF downloads: 51