THE RELATION BETWEEN WATER CONTENT IN CONTACT LENS AND DRY EYE SYNDROME (DES) IN STUDENTS OF ATMA JAYA CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF INDONESIA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND HEALTH SCIENCES

Authors

  • Levina Benita Fakultas Kedokteran dan Ilmu Kesehatan Unika Atma Jaya
  • Cisca Kuswidyati Departemen Ilmu Kesehatan Mata, Fakultas Kedokteran dan Ilmu Kesehatan Unika Atma Jaya
  • Febie Chriestya Departemen Ilmu Penyakit Dalam, Fakultas Kedokteran dan Ilmu Kesehatan Unika Atma Jaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25170/djm.v18i2.2216

Keywords:

students, dry eye syndrome/DES, water content, tear break up time/TBUT, Schirmer.

Abstract

Introduction: Dry Eye Syndrome (DES) is a multifactorial disease of the eye characterized by loss of homeostasis from the tear film and is accompanied by ocular symptoms. One of many factors that can cause DES is the use of contact lenses. This research was conducted to determine the relationship of water content in contact lenses with the occurrence of DES.


Methods: This research was conducted in 2019 with a cross-sectional study design with the Tear Break Up Time (TBUT) test, Schirmer test and questionnaire. The research respondents were students of Atma Jaya School of Medicine and Health Sciences (FKIK UAJ) whose eyes were examined as samples (n = 84). The water content of the respondent's contact lenses was obtained using a questionnaire. The inspection methods used to determine DES are TBUT test and Schirmer test. Data analysis using chi-square test with significance level of p <0.05.


Results: The prevalence of DES obtained in students with a water content <50% is 25.9%, while the DES in students with a water content >50% is 25.5% .


Conclusion: There is no significant relationship between water content in contact lenses with the occurrence of DES in FKIK UAJ students (p=0.963).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Definition of contact lens in English by Oxford Dictionaries [Internet]. Oxford Dictionaries English. 2018. Available from: https://en.ox-forddictionaries.com/definition/contact_lens.

Tina K, Joseph H, J Angelo G, K Scott Phillips, Malvina BE. Updating the contact lens classification system. http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/
devadvice: FDA Center of Devices and Radio-logical Health. 2011. p.38.

Aldebasi YH, Aly SM, Ahmad MI. Compli-cations of contact lenses; a clinico-experimen-tal study to evaluate the effects of bacterial contamination.Pak J Ophthalmol 2013;29(3).

Stapleton F, Stretton S, Papas E, Skotnitsky C, Sweeney DF. Silicone hydrogel contact lenses and the ocular surface. Ocul Surf. 2014;4:24–43.

Nelson JD, Craig JP, Akpek E et al. The definition and classification of dry eye disease: report of the Definition and Classification Subcommittee of the International Dry Eye WorkShop. Ocul Surf 2017:5(2):75-92. 6. J. A. Smith, J. Albenz, C. Begley, et al. The epidemiology of dry eye disease: report of the epidemiology subcommittee of the interna-tional Dry Eye WorkShop. Ocular Surface 2007;5(2):93–107

Pritchard N, Fonn D, Brazeau D. 2009. Discontinuation of contact lenswear: a survey. Int Contact Lens Clin 26: 157-162.

M. Fujita, T. Igarashi, T. Kurai, M. Sakane, S. Yoshino, H. Takahashi. Correlation between dry eye and rheumatoid arthritis activity. The American Journal of Ophthalmology 2005; 140(5):808–813.

American Optometric Association. Optometric clinic al practice guideline: care of the patient with ocular surface disorders. http://www.aoa. org/documents/CPG-10.pdf. 2003.

Gilbard JP. The diagnosis and management of dry eyes. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2005;38:871-885.

M. B. Abelson, G. W. Ousler III, L. A. Nally, D. Welch, K. Krenzer. Alternative reference values for tear film break up time in normal and dry eye populations. Advances in Experi-mental Medicine and Biology 2002;506:1121-5.

N. Yokoi, A. Komuro. Non-invasive methods of assessing the tear film. Experimental Eye Research 2004;78(3):399–407.

Santodomingo RJ, Wolffsohn JS, Gilmartin B. Changes in ocular physiology, tear film characteristics, and symptomatology with 18 months silicon hydrogel CL wear. Optom and Vis Sci 2006;83:73-81.

Synder C. Preocular tears film anomalies and lens- related dryness. In: Silbert J, ed. Anterior Segment complications of Contact Lens Wear. 2nd edn. Butterworth-Heinemann;2000:3-21.

Toda I, Shimazaki J, Tsubota K. Dry eye with only decreased tear break-up time is some-times associated with allergic conjunctivitis. Ophthalmology. 1995;102:302–9.

Kawashima M, Yamada M, Suwaki K, et al. A clinic-based survey of clinical characteristics and practice pattern of dry eye in Japan. Adv Ther 2017;34:732–43.

Maruyama K, Yokoi N, Takamata A, Kinoshita S. Effect of environmental conditions on tear dynamics in soft contact lens wearers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:2563–8.

Iskeleli G, Karakoç Y, Aydin O, Yetik H, Uslu H, Kizilkaya M. Comparison of tear-film osmolarity in different types of contact lenses. CLAO J. 2002;28(4):174–6.

Tomlinson A, Khanal S, Ramaesh K, Diaper C, McFadyen A. Tear film osmolarity: determination of a referent for dry eye diagnosis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47(10):4309–15.

Published

2019-11-15

How to Cite

1.
Benita L, Kuswidyati C, Chriestya F. THE RELATION BETWEEN WATER CONTENT IN CONTACT LENS AND DRY EYE SYNDROME (DES) IN STUDENTS OF ATMA JAYA CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF INDONESIA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND HEALTH SCIENCES. DJM [Internet]. 2019 Nov. 15 [cited 2024 Nov. 27];18(2):50-7. Available from: https://ejournal.atmajaya.ac.id/index.php/damianus/article/view/2216
Abstract views: 216 | PDF downloads: 239