Publication Ethics
Metris: Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi is dedicated to maintaining the greatest standards of publication ethics and will stop at anything to prevent any unethical publishing activities. Among other things, the Editorial Board oversees stopping publication misconduct. Metris: Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi does not support unethical activity and does not permit plagiarism of any kind. Authors who have contributed articles: confirm that the content of the manuscript is original. Additionally, the submission by the authors indicates that the work has not been previously published in any language, in whole or in part, and that it is not presently being considered for publication anywhere else. Metris: Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi editors, writers, and reviewers accept full responsibility for carrying out the following tasks and responsibilities and are devoted to upholding acceptable publication practices.
Journal publication ethics guidelines.
The process of continuous knowledge enhancement is the publication of a paper in the peer-reviewed journals issued by the Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia. It is an accurate representation of the quality of the writers' output and the organizations that encourage it. The scientific method is supported and reflected in publications with peer review. All parties involved in the process of publishing, including the author, journal editor, peer reviewer, publisher, and society of society-owned or sponsored journals, should thus agree upon criteria of anticipated ethical behavior.
Authors' obligations
Reporting requirements
Report writers of original research should give a factual description of the work completed and an unbiased analysis of its importance. The paper should accurately present the underlying data. A paper should have enough information and citations so that other people may do the same research. It is unethical and unprofessional to make false or intentionally erroneous statements. Editorial "opinion" works should be clearly marked as such, while reviews and professionally published pieces should also be factual and objective.
Access and retention of data
The raw data may be requested from authors when submitting an article for editorial review. In any case, they ought to be ready to hold onto such information for a fair amount of time following publishing.
Plagiarism and originality
The writers must make sure that everything in the work they completed is original, and if they used materials from others, they must have properly cited or quoted them. Plagiarism can take many different forms, such as 'passing off' another author's work as one's own, copying or paraphrasing significant portions of another author's work without giving credit, or making claims about the findings of other people's studies. Any sort of plagiarism is not desired and should be avoided as unethical publication conduct.
Multiple, redundant, or ongoing publications
In general, an author shouldn't write articles that effectively describe the same research in many journals or main publications. It is immoral and improper to submit the same paper simultaneously to many journals as this is considered an unethical publishing practice. ideally, an author should never submit a work that has already been published to be considered in another journal.
Acknowledgement of sources
Others' contributions must always be properly acknowledged. Publications that have influenced the understanding of the reported work's nature should be cited by authors. Similar to discussions, letters, and conversations with third parties, information that is collected in private cannot be utilized or reported without the source's express written consent.
Authorship of the paper
People who have significantly influenced the idea, planning, execution, or interpretation of the published study should be able to claim authorship. As co-authors, everyone who has contributed significantly ought to be mentioned. Others who have contributed to the study activity in any significant way should be recognized or noted as contributors. The corresponding author is responsible for making sure that each co-author has reviewed, authorized, and consented to the paper's submission for publication.
Risks and topics concerning humans or animals
The author of the article must make it apparent whether the work includes the use of hazardous chemicals, processes, or equipment. If the research uses human or animal subjects, the author must make sure that the publication states that all procedures were carried out by institutional norms and applicable regulations and that the relevant institutional committee or committees have authorized them. The manuscript should state that informed consent was obtained before using human subjects for experimentation. Human subjects' right to privacy must always be respected.
Conflicts of interest and disclosure
Any financial or other significant conflicts of interest that could be interpreted to have an impact on the manuscript's interpretation or outcomes should be declared by all authors. Disclosure of all funding sources for the project is required. Employment, consultancies, stock ownership, honoraria, paid expert testimony, patent applications/registrations, grants or other funding are a few examples of potential conflicts of interest that need to be declared. As soon as feasible, such conflicts of interest should be declared.
Typical mistakes in works that were published
It is the responsibility of the author to promptly tell the journal editor or publisher of any serious error or inaccuracy found in their own published work, and to work with the editor to retract or fix the manuscript. It is the author's responsibility to either immediately retract or revise the published work or give proof to the editor that the original work proved correct if the editor or publisher finds out through a third party that a published work contains a serious error.
Reviewers' obligations
Participation in Editorial Decisions
The editor conducts peer reviews to inform editorial decisions, and editorial correspondence with authors can help authors improve their work.
Timeliness
If a referee is chosen and feels unfit to examine the research presented in a manuscript or knows that reviewing it quickly won't be feasible, they should inform the editor and withdraw from the review process.
Keep Information Private
Manuscripts submitted for review are intended to be handled as private correspondence. They may only be seen or discussed with others with the editor's permission.
Objectivity Standards
Reviews ought to be carried out impartially. It is forbidden to criticize the author personally. Referees should clearly state their opinions and provide evidence to back them up.
Recognition of Sources
Reviewers must locate relevant published work that hasn't been cited by the authors. Any claim that an observation, deduction, or argument has been previously published should be supported by the pertinent citation. Any significant similarity or overlap between the manuscript being considered and any other published material about which the reviewer is personally aware should also be brought to the editor's attention.
Conflict of Interest and Disclosure
Ideas or privileged information that have undergone peer review must be kept private and not exploited for personal advantage. Manuscripts containing conflicts of interest arising from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or affiliations with any authors, companies, or institutions associated with the articles should not be considered to be assessed by reviewers.
Editors' obligations
Publication decisions
Selecting articles for publication in a peer-reviewed journal is the responsibility of the editor, who frequently collaborates with the appropriate society (in the case of publications owned or supported by societies). Such choices must always be based on the validity of the work in question and its significance to readers and scholars. The journal's editorial board regulations and any applicable laws pertaining to plagiarism, libel, and copyright infringement may serve as guidelines for the editor at that time. When making this choice, the editor may consult with other editors, reviewers, or society officers.
Fair play
Editors should consider only the intellectual quality of manuscripts, not the writers' political philosophy, gender, color, sexual orientation, or place of citizenship.
Keep Information Private
Any information on a submitted article may only be shared by the editor and any editorial staff with the associated author, reviewers or potential reviewers, any editorial advisers, and the publisher, as applicable.
Conflicts of interest and disclosure
Without the author's express written authorization, unpublished materials provided in a submitted manuscript cannot be used by an editor for their own research. Ideas or privileged information that have undergone peer review must be kept private and not exploited for one's own gain. Editors should refrain from reviewing manuscripts in which they have a conflict of interest due to competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or (possibly) institutions connected to the papers (i.e., ask a co-editor, associate editor, or other members of the editorial board to review and consider instead). It is recommended that editors mandate that all writers declare any relevant competing interests and publish any necessary revisions.
Open Access Policy
Metris: Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi is an open-access and peer-reviewed scientific journal that aims to achieve state-of-the-art theory and application related to industrial engineering and management.
Process of Peer Review
(Tidak ada perubahan)
Author Guidelines
Submission Preparation Checklist
As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors who do not adhere to these guidelines.
- The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor).
- The submission file is in Microsoft Word document file format.
- Where available, URLs for the references have been provided.
- The text is single-spaced, uses a 10-point font, employs italics rather than underlining (except with URL addresses), and all illustrations, figures, and tables are placed within the text at the appropriate points, rather than at the end.
- The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines.
- If submitting to a peer-reviewed section of the journal, the instructions in Ensuring a Blind Review have been followed.
- General Author Guidelines
All manuscripts must be submitted to Metris: Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi Editorial Office using Online Submission at E-Journal portal address:
https://ejournal.atmajaya.ac.id/index.php/metris/about/submissions
Where the author registers as an Author in an open journal system.
Three manuscripts are acceptable for publication: an original research paper, a review paper, and a case study.
Research paper
The work that reports an in-depth study and is categorized as the main literature is called an original research paper. The structure includes an introduction, background problems, methodology, interpretation of findings, and discussion sections.
Review article
A review paper is an article that offers a current report on the state of affairs pertaining to specific significant issues in a scope journal. It provides an outline of the future and talks about earlier developments on the subject. A review article is typically lengthy, depending on the case under consideration.
Case study
An essay written by the author(s) and published in the scope journal that provides specifics of unique cases is called a case study. These are often the cases that have a major impact on the field's body of knowledge. The indicators, symptoms, diagnosis, and problem-solving techniques should all be covered in this article.
- Manuscript Template
The manuscript should be prepared according to the following author guidelines in the MS Word.
The template is available for download at this link. [Download Template]
MANUSCRIPT FORMAT
The manuscript should be uploaded to the Metris: Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi system and arranged in Metris: Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi standard format: Title, Authors, Address and Email, Abstract, Keywords, Introduction, Methods, Result and Discussion, Conclusion, and References. For optional: Data Availability, Declarations, and Acknowledgment.
Typed in A4 size, in a single column, one space line, 10-point Times New Roman font. The maximum paper length is 15 pages. The author writes the manuscript in one-column format. The Metris: Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi Design Editor will create formatting in two columns.
Manuscript Title
A Title Is Fewest Possible Words, Accurately Describe The Content (Maximum 15 Word, Times New Roman 18, Don’t Abbreviation)
Authors
The manuscript has the main author and co-authors with the full name of the author and co-authors (no abbreviation), includes an address (es) and email addresses clearly.
Abstracts
The Abstract should be informative and completely self-explanatory, provide a clear statement of the problem, the proposed approach or solution, and point out major findings and conclusions. The Abstract should be a maximum of 250 words in length. The abstract should be written in English and in the past tense. Standard nomenclature should be used, and abbreviations should be avoided. No literature should be cited.
Keywords
The keywords should be avoiding general and plural terms and multiple concepts. Do not use words or terms in the title as keywords. These keywords will be used for indexing purposes. Keywords should not more than 5 words or phrases.
- Introduction
The Introduction should provide a clear background, a clear statement of the problem, the relevant literature on the subject, the proposed approach or solution, and the new value of research which is innovation. It should be understandable to colleagues from a broad range of scientific disciplines.
- Methodology
Describe the research process, research design, and research chronology. To ensure that the explanation is accepted by science, the research course description needs to be backed up by references. A Theory section establishes the groundwork for future research and should build upon the background information already covered in the Introduction rather than restating it. A section on calculations shows how a theoretical foundation is developed practically.
- Results and Discussion
Research findings are explained, and a thorough discussion is also provided. Results can be shown in ways that are easy for the reader to understand, such as tables, graphs, and figures. There are multiple sub-chapters in which to examine this. The current international system should be adhered to when choosing the unit of measurement. Every figure and table in the text should be active and editable by the editor, and they should be presented individually at the end of each page.
- Conclusion
The conclusion should be explained clearly. The suggestion placed after the conclusion contains a recommendation on the research done or an input that can be used directly by the consumer.
Citations and References
The styles of references and citations should follow the Name-Years System (Harvard System). All references should be to the most pertinent and up-to-date sources. Please use a consistent format for references. Please double-check: every citation in the text must match up to an entry in the reference list and vice-versa. It is recommended to use a citation manager such as Mendeley, Zotero or EndNote. References must always be given in sufficient detail for the reader to locate the work cited (see below for formats).
Example
- Bridger R.S., 1995. Introduction to Ergonomics. New York: McGraw-Hill. (Book)
- Kroemer, K.H.E. 2003. Engineering Anthropometry. In Occupational Ergonomics: Principles of Work Design. (pp.9-1 – 9.27).
- Iskandar, W. 2007. Design and prototype fabrication of Automated Guided Vehicle. Tugas Akhir. Jakarta: Universitas Katolik Indonesia Jakarta. (Unpublished thesis)
- 2008. Definition of ergonomics. (http://www.jea.cc). Diakses tanggal 7 Maret 2008. Electronic source)
- Mokdad, M. 2002. Anthropometric study of Algerian farmers. Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 29: 331-341. (Journal)
- Widyanti, A., Aulia, Yassierli, Iridiastati, H. 2007. Pengembangan model antropometri dimensi lingkar tubuh berdasarkan data linier dengan menggunakan kombinasi pengukuran manual dan digital. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ergonomi (pp. 37 -36). Bandung: Universitas Pasundan. (Proceeding)
Figures
All figures should be embedded correctly positioned within your Word files and supplied as separate graphics files in their original formats. EPS, TIFF, or PSD formats are preferred. Use a minimum of 300 dpi.
Figures should appear in numerical order, be described in the body of the text, and be positioned close to where they are first cited. Each figure should have a caption that describes the illustration, which can be understood independently of the main text. The caption should be given in the text and not on the figure itself.
Because figures may be resized in production, please use scale bars and not magnification factors.
Tables
Please submit tables as editable text and not as images. Number tables consecutively by their appearance in the text and place any table notes above the table body. Be sparing in tables and ensure that the data presented in them do not duplicate results described elsewhere in the article. Please avoid using vertical lines.
Make sure all figures and tables will fit inside the text area.
- Reviewing of manuscripts
One peer-reviewer independently reviews every submitted paper. The publication, amendment, or rejection decision is based upon the reviewer’s reports/recommendations and made by the Editor. If the reviewer considers a manuscript unsuitable for publication in this journal, a statement explaining the basis for the decision will be sent to the authors.
- Revision of manuscripts
Manuscripts sent back to the authors for revision should be returned to the editor without delay. Revised manuscripts can be sent to the editorial office through the Online Submission Interface. The revised manuscripts returned later than three months will be considered as new submissions. Because the review process is a blind review, the author's identity is removed when the manuscript is sent to the reviewer. When the Author sends a revision, the Author must re-complete the name and affiliation of the Author(s).
- Guideline for Online Submission
The author should first register as Author and is offered as a Reviewer through the following address: http://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/industri/about/submissions#onlineSubmissions
Step 1 - Starting the Submission
Step 2 – Uploading the Submission: To upload a manuscript to this journal, click Browse on the Upload submission file item and choose the manuscript document file (.doc/.docx) to be submitted, then click the "Upload" button until the file has been uploaded.
Step 3 – Entering Submission’s Metadata: In this step, detailed author(s) metadata should be entered, including the marked corresponding author. After that, the manuscript title and abstract must be uploaded by copying the text and paste it into the textbox, including keywords.
Step 4 – Uploading Supplementary Files if necessary.
Step 5 – Confirming the Submission: The author should final check the uploaded manuscript documents in this step. To submit the manuscript to the Metris: Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi, click the Finish Submission button after the documents are true. The corresponding author or the principal contact will receive an acknowledgment by email. It will view the submission’s progress through the editorial process by logging in to the journal web address site.
After this submission, the Authors who submit the manuscript will get a confirmation email about the submission. Therefore, Authors can track their submission status at any time by logging in to the online submission interface. The submission tracking includes the status of manuscript review and editorial process.
