PENGARUH OCCUPATIONAL SELF EFFICACY TERHADAP WORK ENGAGEMENT YANG DIMEDIASI OLEH HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT CLIMATE DI PT OLYMPIC BANGUN PERSADA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25170/jm.v16i2.896Kata Kunci:
Occupational Self Efficacy, Work Engagement, Human Resource Development ClimateAbstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membuktikan apakah terdapat pengaruh dari Occupational Self Efficacy terhadap Work Engagement yang dimediasi oleh variabel Human Resource Development Climate.Penelitian ini dilakukan di Kantor Pusat PT Olympic Bangun Persada dengan melibatkan beberapa karyawan yang ada didalam perusahaan.Penulis menyebarkan kuesioner yang terdiri dari 15 pertanyaan tentang Occupational Self Efficacy, 15 pertanyaan tentang Work Engagement, dan 15 pertanyaan tentang Human Resource Development Climate kepada 100 karyawan di PT Olympic Bangun Persada.Pengolahan data dilakukan dengan software SPSS v23 dan macro Hayes PROCESS v3. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukan terdapat hubungan yang signifikan ditemukan antara semua variabel dalam penelitian ini.Didukung semua studi hipotesis.Human Resource Development Climate ditemukan dapat memediasi hubungan antara Occupational Self Efficacy danWork Engagement.Dan hasil penelitian juga menunjukan bahwa variabel mediasi Human Resource Development Climate memiliki peran sebagai mediasi komplementer (complementary mediation).
Referensi
available at: www.aon.com (accessed 12 September 2011).
Bandura, A. (1997). Self Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman
Chen, G., Gully, S.M., Eden, D. (2001). Validation ofa New General Self Efficacy
Scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4 (1), 62-83.
Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S, & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work engagement: A
quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64, 89-136
Demerouti, E. & Cropanzano, R. (2010). From thought to action: Employee work
engagement and job performance. Dalam A.B. Bakker & M.P. Leiter (Eds.), Work engagement : A handbook of essential theory and research (147-163). New York: Psychology Press.
Hakanen, J.J., Bakker, A.B. and Schaufeli, W.B. (2006), “Burnout and work
engagement among teachers”, Journal of School Psychology, Vol. 43 No. 6, pp. 495-513.
Halbesleben, J.R.B. (2010), “A meta-analysis of work engagement: relationships with
burnout, demands, resources and consequences”, in Bakker, A.B.and Leiter, M.P. (Eds), Work Engagement: A Handbook of Essential Theory and Research, Psychology Press, New York, NY, pp. 118-31.
Hassan, A., Hashim, J. and Ismail, A.Z.H. (2006), “Human resource development
practices as determinants of HRD climate and quality orientation”, Journal of European Industrial Training, Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 4-18.
Ivarcevich, J.M., Donnelly, J.H., & Gibson, J.L. (1994).Organization :Behavior,
Structure, Processes (8thEd.). Boston, MA : Irwin.
Kahn, W.A. 1990, Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement
at work, Academy of Management Journal, 33, 692-724.
Llorens, S., Salanova, M., Schaufeli, W.B. and Bakker, A.B. (2007), “Does a positive
gain spiral of resources, efficacy beliefs and engagement exist?”, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 23No. 1, pp. 825-4.
Mishra, M. (1999), “Job satisfaction as a correlate of HRD climate: an empirical study”,
Indian Journal of Training and Development, Vol. 29 No. 2, p. 5.
Mohanty, K. and Routray, P. (2009), HRD Climate and Organisational Climate, Excel
Books, New Delhi.
Pethe, S., Chaudhary, S. and Dhar, U. (1999), Occupational Self-efficacy Scale and
Manual, National Psychological Corporation, Agra.
Rao, T.V. and Abraham, E. (1986), “HRD climate in organizations”, in Rao, T.V.
(Ed.), Readings in Human Resource Development, IBH Publishing, Oxford and New Delhi, pp. 36-45.
Robinson, D., Perryman, S. & Hayday, S. 2004, The Drivers of Employee Engagement,
Institute for Employment Studies, Brighton.
Salanova, M., Schaufeli, W., Martínez, I., & Bresó, E. (2010). How obstacles and
facilitatorspredict academic performance: The mediating role of study burnout and engagement. Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 23, 53–70.
Schaufeli, W.B. & Bakker, A.B. (2004). Job demands, Job resources, and their
relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 293-315.
Schaufeli, W.B. & Bakker, A.B. (2010). Defining and measuring work engagement:
bringing clarity to the concept. In A.B. Bakker & M.P. Leiter
(Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook ofessential theory and research (pp. 10-
24). New York: Psychology Press.
Sekaran, U 2003, Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach, 4th edn,
John Wiley andSons, New York.
Sugiyono.(2003). Metode Penelitian Bisnis. Bandung. Pusat Bahasa Depdiknas.
Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A.B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W.B. (2007). The role of
personal resources in the job demands-resources model. International Journal of Stress Management, 14, 121-41.
Zhao, X., Lynch, J.G., & Chen, Q. (1010).Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and
thruth about mediation analysis.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access).
